Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> >So let's say we have a list with min-elements = 1 (such as the list of RIBs), and there 
> >is already one entry provided by the system. what has to be done in order to make <inten
> >ded> valid? Should the system-controlled entry permeate up to <intended>?
> 
> We should update the draft to make it clear to allow system-controlled
> data to appear as part of the template/expansion activity so that
> such data can be referred to from the running config.

Ok, but I wouldn't call this data system-controlled.  It is added by
the template expansion algorithm and thus part of intended and thus
marked with an origin 'static'.

/martin

> For example,
> a static route could have a next-hop of a system-defined lo0.  Not
> that this is a good idea, but...
> 
> Thanks,
>  Phil
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 