Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D756129629 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:30:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NeK8hEn1ime9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C14A127077 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.42]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8767B1AE00B6; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:30:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:29:28 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <20161117.102928.2078039401332691273.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: phil@juniper.net
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <201611170803.uAH83uTD061633@idle.juniper.net>
References: <F45BA0C8-4707-4172-98A7-AEE0F606B612@nic.cz> <201611170803.uAH83uTD061633@idle.juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KIsSgKByQWpqYzA4i6Bwc8fuH3w>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:30:37 -0000

Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> >So let's say we have a list with min-elements = 1 (such as the list of RIBs), and there 
> >is already one entry provided by the system. what has to be done in order to make <inten
> >ded> valid? Should the system-controlled entry permeate up to <intended>?
> 
> We should update the draft to make it clear to allow system-controlled
> data to appear as part of the template/expansion activity so that
> such data can be referred to from the running config.

Ok, but I wouldn't call this data system-controlled.  It is added by
the template expansion algorithm and thus part of intended and thus
marked with an origin 'static'.


/martin


> For example,
> a static route could have a next-hop of a system-defined lo0.  Not
> that this is a good idea, but...
> 
> Thanks,
>  Phil
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>