Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 07 March 2018 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831F81270FC; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 06:17:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mja1JCMyMBsg; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 06:17:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12306124207; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 06:17:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2256; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520432271; x=1521641871; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UYxVwRN0JNUp3bl5inKxSgxNUWwvyiqoC877oAoN3/k=; b=bADSfq+SJNfLvjcJ0loZzP99mi1J3sOvrUe1UFq/yqfNiXeSB1qhSKoR kbB9kB+JH3hdpQKFGmnSzwoUIDchI0bPstYCaN5VBLjOVEWoKrheVaD/e +V0VM6ZF3NUAIlxplnNP5+Rd/9Xmr6kDpWROM/tBddofo4XcRMuX5ld/a g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BzAQBr859a/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYQ2cCiDVIsYkB6USIIBCiWFCwKDKzcVAQIBAQEBAQECayeFJAY?= =?us-ascii?q?jBBE2CxALDgwCJgICVwYBDAgBAYUXEKhUgW06hHKDcoIcBYEPhCKEBYIPgwSDL?= =?us-ascii?q?gIBAQEBgToBEgGDKoJiBIgjhVmMawmGVIokB4FnhDeCeIVkiX6BTIYNgS40ImF?= =?us-ascii?q?YEQgzGggbFTqCQ4JjgWY/NwGJToI6AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,436,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="2435983"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2018 14:17:49 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w27EHm1G012583; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 14:17:49 GMT
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, kwatsen@juniper.net, draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <152036678480.28267.2878978732820211120.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <965b6867-b409-e719-b8c0-73b620241a78@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:17:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <152036678480.28267.2878978732820211120.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KP0wPbDB005U8Eu7reZRUsewraA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:17:53 -0000

Hi Alexey, Warren,
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you for this document.
>
> I also prefer for TCP to be documented, if used in real world.
I've seen this comment in Warren's comment at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model/ballot/#warren-kumari. 
However, I can't find his ballot in email.
So let me reply to both of you here.

This was discussed on the NETMOD mailing list. See subject "I-D Action: 
draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-19.txt"
The fact is that RFC 6587 is now historic, implying a historic downref.

I'm in favor to publish the document as it is right now, whose 00 WG 
doc. version dates from Nov 2014.
Augmenting a YANG module, if TCP is required, is not that hard.

Regards, Benoit
>
> Some minor comments:
>
> 1) Please add a Normative Reference for the file: URI RFC (RFC 8089) when you
> mention it for the first time.
>
> 2) On page 19:
>
> Example: compare->equals and action->no-match means
> messages that have a severity that is not equal to the
> specified severity will be logged.";
>
> Do you mean "action->block" instead of "action->no-match"?
>
> 3) When logging to file: how is the file name constructed from the name file:
> URI if multiple files are preserved by the system? E.g. if the log file is
> rotated daily and 5 last files are preserved, how does each individual filename
> look? If I understood how this is used, this needs more clarification.
>
> 4) Nit: on page 18, typo in "spectify"
>
>
> .
>