[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 14 February 2018 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9546B124234 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:18:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rP3IwE2z0yZc for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:18:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C053F120454 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:18:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1951; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1518614325; x=1519823925; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=dEwZO2UH77IrQ5vZGt6h+HCJnSI37F0wMIhvRBb68iY=; b=NG/XLDHeXPMGaAIWcDCCCcTpm+rSedyaY2mhbdWQIAN1rRfV2EWYBC4n bgIDdsdv8adk4pEMYlTOWvDxYWpiITPnaxmSsukFlyIGxz4FB89iN3jIf qupf8L5anTsMNEtgBVB5gmzi2MQ2wfgpkQFDZHe7hu8L0WeUJAY3jxGK4 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CQAQDONoRa/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYUohA2LGJAnkGeFcIIDCokJFAECAQEBAQEBAmsohRozdAEOMAJ?= =?us-ascii?q?LFA0IAQGKMa9LgicmhFuDfYITAQEIAgElhQGDbIFoKYdvg0+CZQWkLwmWBYIfh?= =?us-ascii?q?iqDc4gJkACIGYE8NiKBUDMaCBsVgwSEd0COHQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,512,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217";a="2068074"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2018 13:18:42 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1EDIgKa027956 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:18:42 GMT
To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <d4a73a00-dce2-2f11-29d0-0eb34920fd3f@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:18:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7800BCED7E7FC4B2011D4240"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/K_xOsOA3JhvT7g6KcniJZ0B8_-M>
Subject: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:18:47 -0000

Dear all,

- the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned.
Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro

    The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management
    Datastore Architecture defined in I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores.

- As mentioned in the writeup, [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] 
should be an informative reference, not normative.

- Editorial:
OLD:
This draft addresses the common leafs
NEW:
This document addresses the common leafs

Please publish a new version asap.
In the mean time, I'm sending this draft to IETF LC.

Regards, Benoit