IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] 'status' statement needed on every node

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 05 September 2017 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47915132DA2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1TwIfrAh2pg for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0094.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD7DF132D62 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=pm5pgJ2C3W2PlIkPD0AT06HxukyX/XZHwgl0g0jyeTA=; b=Ku8JUG5gkxQFC17f2X7A3Keguuyb4p3Krxhiv6tzEemNAy1ebX0t41pa1jbXovs57kQGadd3RSXR6hFG84MoInAXlrQDqytLwR9I3kWPxlyqCuSbdntglyIB/0ZodujpDmVeukGhRb+NIB5NI/GCEQUX9k/VntgG3Z46G8PzslU=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1153.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.113.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.35.3; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:40:23 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.20.0035.010; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:40:23 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: 'status' statement needed on every node
Thread-Index: AQHTJm4NQwnHS69prEmUfJVnsti89w==
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:40:23 +0000
Message-ID: <13F2175A-C913-4173-BE2A-50C668C08FF6@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1153; 6:Wk4jw3ugjKt5eVGM+yy/Y8CKOcB/qZ4OuWnnQshPDjU89GFfhoHZL1VkMFAp7cOoHzXYE6mRab4u7mapL0mEH9BWktTwIPRQkabF00P7llriU2W3Tag1kLUoeH+85xYYDIA4xWPBJJAQMxKWhGHKWavf99MF6zy5/dSNWBVp9UwSkClDCcEYLM7l1Hgkeb5NFNInSuSwpixcrc7V6g3mpkYcKCSqC5iP+L0u0L8Unh4t1hGYJokZswWEVK/xzB3rr2zKL6OnzCnV9cZJNTdpXc1zZBFjOzcPvPyESmWOlcEF2eRsU3s5Jtp409muttAYa9eyPXIK7AArP5VzygqTKA==; 5:BwxFtZlAGjnyfCUWfegjDRQR+zMWy1mi3m48COIdpvQBB2UI2QjLiVJ1lcPAKRj69VZnXBnqQuL/IsI0fjPUbm6lsrSMdKrgnstblXWZZ7OXLa3f7L0/eJk/SZiY6jeTApocm9BWfg0HfC80tvtNvg==; 24:E4eCHAJLpq0FyoVP6oeGX8EBcaxZllyX0NrRsBb4gG3xUsz+TCJ5a11/RKHnBuP94yrjiXuAJbwwHEIegNmAN7f4bcByo+4kT3u70vbDatg=; 7:EmfzWz34Zgfs2bUfscxxTlimp2R9KBJHAb3w3zN3l8OPC+XzEE3RzvOdVB7ZAQcGDHLWo0ptNLCAD55MoW+p73Ad5K3WrvF8mSC84F0hLr90+vd1yllsc1C7cauWvvGOAXEoRXUOU5f1mX9IuYVJU5k+jcBf8h7WLXO27ATKdxoHE7vXmdecYscp8JeUe4skj4Ll2Ha2nITe2EHb7TAPEGmwgz/mVP6Mj5iQedIdOZ0=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 686c68ef-e77d-46a9-90cb-08d4f4852ff7
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(300000502095)(300135100095)(22001)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1153;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0501MB1153:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB1153D6234CDE204CD08D9880A5960@BN3PR0501MB1153.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(100000703101)(100105400095)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1153; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1153;
x-forefront-prvs: 0421BF7135
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(189002)(199003)(105586002)(2351001)(8676002)(14454004)(2900100001)(106356001)(478600001)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(7736002)(5640700003)(83506001)(81166006)(8936002)(81156014)(5660300001)(53936002)(83716003)(86362001)(1730700003)(4001350100001)(25786009)(101416001)(66066001)(110136004)(54356999)(97736004)(2906002)(2501003)(6486002)(77096006)(3280700002)(305945005)(189998001)(36756003)(99286003)(82746002)(33656002)(50986999)(6512007)(68736007)(6506006)(6436002)(6916009)(3660700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1153; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7407549DE3F8A449B876D90551F3048F@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Sep 2017 17:40:23.7257 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1153
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KcNkupq5AL5NMJhmA3-RDfGYl8w>
Subject: [netmod] 'status' statement needed on every node
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:40:26 -0000


With all the deprecating of "-state" trees going on these days,
the 'status' statement is getting lots of use.  

I understand that some feel that the status statement needs to be
placed on every node, since it is not inherited.  This sentiment
likely stems from RFC 7950 stating "If no status is specified, 
the default is current" and, of course, it not stating that status
is inherited.

I appreciate that this is just following rules, but it seems
excessive and I don't understand how any other interpretation
makes sense.

Also I question how it's supposed to work for a grouping that 
is used once in a deprecated tree and again in a not deprecated 
tree.  What if the grouping is defined in another RFC?  Would
we need to copy the grouping into the current module in order
to set status deprecated on all of its nodes?


Kent // contributor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email