[netmod] Query about draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06

Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACCC12D877 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 19:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.94
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.94 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aFaOKTZgTC9X for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 19:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50631200E5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2018 19:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D86AE64F7FA25 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 03:31:23 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMA422-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 9 May 2018 03:31:24 +0100
Received: from DGGEMA502-MBS.china.huawei.com ([]) by dggema422-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Wed, 9 May 2018 10:31:15 +0800
From: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Query about draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06
Thread-Index: AdPnPP5v6upIMk70QLabNfGFekjJXA==
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 02:31:15 +0000
Message-ID: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6B203A98@DGGEMA502-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6B203A98DGGEMA502MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KuaP33in52iXRUJ6YQwAJUYLDts>
Subject: [netmod] Query about draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 02:31:30 -0000

Hi All,

1.       "import-only-module" is currently under the "module-set" list. How does the client benefit by learning which module-set imports which modules ?

2.       Whether we can keep the "import-only-module" as a sibling to module-set. And let it list all the imported modules.

3.  Section 3 mentions the text  "A common use case is the operational state datastore schema which is a
  superset of the schema used by conventional configuration datastores. ". ==> I think it should be "maybe a superset" based on Point 3 of "Objectives" section.

4.       Also I feel the text about "netconf-capability-change" notification based on yang-library checksum should be moved to the NETCONF NMDA draft.  Is it not more suitable there ?

With Regards,
Rohit R Ranade