Re: [netmod] Closing this issue: choice/case in tree diagrams (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Sat, 10 March 2018 09:06 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAF1126FB3; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 01:06:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id almzQpxDe_kQ; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 01:06:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E7B51201FA; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 01:06:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5447; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520672813; x=1521882413; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DRt1l7YytYK7jcxyeE6cvYa1CDvxTvBgCJRmhUt4YNI=; b=NQbEAOYRj3EfBxBVCAPipQClcGKFd9p478job83BYAIgpncs3hHelZ02 mDCNQeF1uKTFM00EdIrRXJWI/Fov86Wb5lpQhS4Ios9iYn/RHFt2QrDIe eG0b5S9ebhVlCMXoJceuBjvNsk+uHh202fmZzv2RuQC9ZBPEM3HpsHLEO 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B6AQDznqNa/xbLJq1bAxkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEHAQEBAQGENm8og1CLEo5aKYEWlEaCAQoYC4QzTwKDMjcVAQIBAQEBAQECayeFJAEBBAEBIQ8BBTYZAgkCDgIIAgIfBwICGwwwBgEMBgIBAYUUD40bnW2CJohhghUFBYEIhCiEBIIPDIJ5gy4BAYE5WSaCQYJiBI1yjGQJkFsHiQmFVotFhgOBLDQigVIzGggbFTqCQ4JjgWQ/N4pRAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,450,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="2486670"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2018 09:06:50 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2A96ott000651; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:06:50 GMT
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, netmod@ietf.org, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <1520262414.7198.35.camel@nic.cz> <6a1ed43f-398b-4538-52aa-d7f8c219047e@tail-f.com> <c9a60629-a1de-0b5b-77a0-595f614bcad8@transpacket.com> <20180306.104411.829341372037212681.mbj@tail-f.com> <20180306124825.joukx2lvszeehrzt@elstar.local> <877eqp2pj9.fsf@nic.cz> <3f699b0a-98b9-dfac-53cc-e2101c43c0eb@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <7db121a9-0b5e-f9c2-8062-acc53ca67498@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:06:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3f699b0a-98b9-dfac-53cc-e2101c43c0eb@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/LMCNwraBvpRcZ9nRm1u7RLebC9A>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Closing this issue: choice/case in tree diagrams (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:06:55 -0000
Thanks all. This issue is closed and we will apply this change right now, part of the AUTH48 process. Regards, Benoit > Dear all, > > The document draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06 is in AUTH48. > It's time to close this issue, let me copy ietf@ietf.org. > If you object to the change below, let me know before the end of the > week. > > The changes are to the text, so that the text is adapted to what the > tools do. No need to change the examples, or tooling. > > OLD: > <flags> is one of: > rw for configuration data > ro for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs > and actions, and notification parameters > -w for input parameters to rpcs and actions > -u for uses of a grouping > -x for rpcs and actions > -n for notifications > mp for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement > NEW: > <flags> is one of: > rw for configuration data- and choice nodes > ro for non-configuration data- and choice nodes, > output parameters to rpcs and actions, and > notification parameters > -w for input parameters to rpcs and actions > -u for uses of a grouping > -x for rpcs and actions > -n for notifications > mp for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement > case nodes do not have any <flags>. > > and > > OLD: > > <name> is the name of the node > (<name>) means that the node is a choice node > :(<name>) means that the node is a case node > > If the node is augmented into the tree from another module, > its name is printed as <prefix>:<name>, where <prefix> is the > prefix defined in the module where the node is defined. > > NEW: > > <name> is the name of the node > (<name>) means that the node is a choice node > :(<name>) means that the node is a case node > > If the node is augmented into the tree from another module, > its name is printed as <prefix>:<name>, where <prefix> is the > prefix defined in the module where the node is defined. > > If the node is a case node, there is no space before the > <name>. > > Regards, Benoit > >> Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>>> OLD: >>>> >>>> <flags> is one of: >>>> rw for configuration data >>>> ro for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs >>>> and actions, and notification parameters >>>> -w for input parameters to rpcs and actions >>>> -u for uses of a grouping >>>> -x for rpcs and actions >>>> -n for notifications >>>> mp for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement >>>> >>>> NEW: >>>> >>>> <flags> is one of: >>>> rw for configuration data >>>> ro for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs >>>> and actions, and notification parameters >>>> -w for input parameters to rpcs and actions >>>> -u for uses of a grouping >>>> -x for rpcs and actions >>>> -n for notifications >>>> mp for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement >>>> >>>> case nodes do not have any <flags>. >>> I still think that it should be 'data node' instead of just >>> 'data'. While not formally imported, the term 'data node' has a >>> definition in RFC 7950. >>> >>> NEWER: >>> >>> <flags> is one of: >>> rw for configuration data nodes >> If we keep it also for choices, then it has to be "schema nodes". >> >>> ro for non-configuration data nodes, output parameters >>> to rpcs >>> and actions, and notification parameters >> Same here. >> >> Lada >> >>> -w for input parameters to rpcs and actions >>> -u for uses of a grouping >>> -x for rpcs and actions >>> -n for notifications >>> mp for nodes containing a "mount-point" extension statement >>> >>> case nodes do not have any <flags>. >>> /js >>> >>> -- >>> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH >>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany >>> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > . >
- [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Per Hedeland
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Per Hedeland
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams joel jaeggli
- [netmod] Closing this issue: choice/case in tree … Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] Closing this issue: choice/case in t… Benoit Claise