Re: [netmod] HTTP: or HTTPS:

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Wed, 31 July 2019 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36355120114 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R76BfsHuD9jq for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A4F1200F6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from birdie (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:a88f:7eff:fed2:45f8]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44006140B29 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:08:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1564571313; bh=tRvQHYpRRxFa4QdoOsY3kUQyMBiPPMY2giVsbkTZk2I=; h=From:To:Date; b=akUJhuCKftnoHv4wksdzx6oKdFMCg/R3dzZywiRBGoKs1Ff01SpPesQfbIUBYKX0c zBeoFKC0DYKf1mMOyYiHfgngpXzQh7Rx5Hz4osWnQrg99tr5C1NOsKAofgDCt/Legg YsBbJWdqQ7HEfPOvQOHpiCftIfxtnyBvuGbqwVPE=
Message-ID: <92dc3ca86f4850afe600ddc6874046505a1d8d7a.camel@nic.cz>
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:08:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <06ee01d5478f$0f827140$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <2dcd4d92-1436-4b9a-050f-ec36053ffa8a@bogus.com> <06ee01d5478f$0f827140$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Organization: CZ.NIC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at mail.nic.cz
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/MEXPExzSE9fvLLYqMqhE7T4sNQU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] HTTP: or HTTPS:
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:08:37 -0000

On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 11:00 +0000, tom petch wrote:
> YANG modules contain several URL - e.g. for the Working Group,  Legal
> provisions, RFC - for which some authors use http:, some use https: and
> some use a mixture.
> 
> Should we be recommending the use of https: in all cases?

Yes, given that the http: URLs now return 404.

Lada

> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67