[netmod] Question on intefaces-state model
"Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <bart.bogaert@nokia.com> Fri, 09 June 2017 10:55 UTC
Return-Path: <bart.bogaert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4661293EC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 03:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxQ8UN0chUFv for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 03:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db5eur01on0130.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.2.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 434A5124217 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 03:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=xYvM9ynJvDCPZC6I2A22vCkhX3XwpBfSUTU4hl4WFCM=; b=EUCJLKsYeTCrijQg2P2L36deDpPv9N86j0tfQfwRe9xvFVPHwcV3r08+PFysVF+T9ejYvYNmcem7naEMDEC3iFiO091cXPhgxEExbgMeqDj3JZzwm1Ix28fOh79hkclNNR1vSql0PztZUALrnY2Bvj6iCRhSAZMkUZvSg4GoUkc=
Received: from AM2PR07MB0627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.160.54.154) by AM2PR07MB0803.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.161.71.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1157.3; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:55:21 +0000
Received: from AM2PR07MB0627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::655e:1682:2089:a05c]) by AM2PR07MB0627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::655e:1682:2089:a05c%16]) with mapi id 15.01.1178.006; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:55:21 +0000
From: "Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <bart.bogaert@nokia.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question on intefaces-state model
Thread-Index: AdLhDRC34rNQajuWS5+4b+qYQggHyQ==
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:55:20 +0000
Message-ID: <AM2PR07MB06272FF9E8BA4D00B0669F9794CE0@AM2PR07MB0627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [135.245.212.1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM2PR07MB0803; 7:FJ1mGu1xYDVD2nPH2wWXx3L0mLwTviTcB/wkNlIXMG3z5QodDjvVcSb3KNU/eVs7rfMhpuSgZL2lHz5StBpSd7wBDQWvG4h616ciy8ZFibrlGdV2k4Ax4aAaCv7IFeJ0aM1ckxmkv1TzpWyjFESlRHZvd3AS5/KSgPPwXc6XmSPtpneTI79NPNmeLzet3zQcg48OHNAkbbLn6QqSDA+rzgmarhDtiKXB4QOReJvQKXz0duMezmRxG1xKxn7rIhDhM59VZOa0Jq6LxtZLumGQCOQ8LJue6gQghu5xg0sb7fG9JLQ9T3e4JNWe/aPsCLhGbvIpN6zGkkIjDmlxLs/ZxA==
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM2PR07MB0803:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 38cfd28d-1403-4ae9-cb42-08d4af260618
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:AM2PR07MB0803;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM2PR07MB08030B5D313CCC9BEE40F0BA94CE0@AM2PR07MB0803.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(102415395)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123558100)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:AM2PR07MB0803; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:AM2PR07MB0803;
x-forefront-prvs: 03333C607F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39840400002)(39850400002)(39400400002)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39860400002)(2906002)(189998001)(5640700003)(2351001)(14454004)(9326002)(6506006)(6436002)(86362001)(55016002)(54896002)(6306002)(9686003)(33656002)(38730400002)(110136004)(53936002)(25786009)(3480700004)(99936001)(66066001)(54356999)(99286003)(50986999)(8936002)(2900100001)(1730700003)(8676002)(81166006)(3280700002)(6916009)(7696004)(5630700001)(5250100002)(2501003)(3660700001)(3846002)(6116002)(102836003)(790700001)(478600001)(7736002)(5660300001)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM2PR07MB0803; H:AM2PR07MB0627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02E2_01D2E11F.A4DD0670"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jun 2017 10:55:20.9801 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM2PR07MB0803
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/NBGxzyNGvLdFpzMHYvMvk4LIJlY>
Subject: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:55:26 -0000
Hi, We have a question regarding the statistics container as defined in the interfaces-state model. This container defines one mandatory leaf (discontinuity-time) while all other leafs are optional. What is the rationale behind this leaf being mandatory and not an optional field? It does not make a lot of sense to return a discontinuity-time value and no counters if none of the counters are relevant for a specific interface. Another alternative could be to add, via a deviation, a when clause to the container indicating for which ifType(s) the container is (or is not) present. But that would lead to not supporting the IETF interfaces model to the full extent. Regards, Bart
- [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Alex Campbell
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Igor Bryskin
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Igor Bryskin
- Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model Vladimir Vassilev