[netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5698)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 18 April 2019 21:14 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411A21200D7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygLpe5u3E-Uh for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7911C120046 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6835FB8286E; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: mbj@tail-f.com, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, joelja@bogus.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, lberger@labn.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: andy@yumaworks.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190418211404.6835FB8286E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:14:04 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/NHBuI_m673ePYTa7kecmuE0Rx2w>
Subject: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5698)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:14:10 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5698 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Section: 7.5.4.3 Original Text ------------- container interface { leaf ifType { type enumeration { enum ethernet; enum atm; } } leaf ifMTU { type uint32; } must 'ifType != "ethernet" or ifMTU = 1500' { error-message "An Ethernet MTU must be 1500"; } must 'ifType != "atm" or' + ' (ifMTU <= 17966 and ifMTU >= 64)' { error-message "An ATM MTU must be 64 .. 17966"; } } Corrected Text -------------- container interface { leaf ifType { type enumeration { enum ethernet; enum atm; } } leaf ifMTU { type uint32; } must 'string(ifType) != "ethernet" or ifMTU = 1500' { error-message "An Ethernet MTU must be 1500"; } must 'string(ifType) != "atm" or' + ' (ifMTU <= 17966 and ifMTU >= 64)' { error-message "An ATM MTU must be 64 .. 17966"; } } Notes ----- The intent of the example is for each must-stmt to be false if the ifType leaf does not exist. However the XPath is incorrect. >From the XPath 1.0 spec, section 3.4, para 5 If one object to be compared is a node-set and the other is a string, then the comparison will be true if and only if there is a node in the node-set such that the result of performing the comparison on the string-value of the node and the other string is true. The empty node-set is not implicitly converted to an empty string for a = or != comparison. Instead the string() function must explicitly convert the node-set to a string Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) -------------------------------------- Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language Publication Date : August 2016 Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7950 (569… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Ignas Bagdonas