IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C796C130E5A for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XXL4LlPS6tu for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B58B130E4F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1759; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538659078; x=1539868678; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QtKewJQ+ioNlO2FTFaS+dElfW4m7KTM+1LrWFfG+PBc=; b=YwsnhV5CKtLgOHlxcMkEYUK9UsTjCverZ09UmaLsiIlC4rwkZXotRX9r 6V8monP5GxLA0ZixDw0KEUlhOuxepY5m7Rpf2EBD2ZMDV4yWU4iL6X6gd NUvwcVT9U7uiFT7ejwUooVKhGhZ4Q8e3MicRss+osWqolY2b00NMLp735 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BTAADWErZb/xbLJq1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBZYJsfyiDdIh0jSAtmFcNGAuEA0YChEY4FgEDAQECAQECbRwMhTkBAQEBAgEBASEPAQU2EAsLGAICJgICJzAGAQwGAgEBgx0BgXkID6NkgS6Ed4UYBYELijiBQT+BOYI2NYMbAQEDhF+CVwKdVwmGSolwBheJFIZXjByDHIYngVkhgVUzGggbFTuCbIIlF4hahT8+MI1kAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,338,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="6995976"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Oct 2018 13:17:45 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.158] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com [10.63.23.158]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w94DHjfn014423; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:17:45 GMT
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <201810031419.w93EJNpn040188@idle.juniper.net> <20181004.121417.2190375850946168105.mbj@tail-f.com> <69afa537-9a5f-6fb6-de21-2add0ffec4b2@cisco.com> <0aa239221e80e812f920db6ae023eabc6b3ef5ed.camel@nic.cz>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ccc83277-cfa7-f363-1beb-78e801f8b675@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:17:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0aa239221e80e812f920db6ae023eabc6b3ef5ed.camel@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.158, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/NMy9HJZKgEaPiBeaKuI9AxbBIpo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:18:01 -0000


On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
>> On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>> Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
>>>> Bal?zs Lengyel writes:
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
>>>> [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...]
>>>>
>>>> Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input
>>>> so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported?   That
>>>> leaf can be an identityref that defaults to yang-patch.
>>> I think this is a good idea.  I would prefer the edit-config format
>>> over YANG patch for describing a diff.  The edit-config format is more
>>> suited for this purpose imo.
>> +1
>>
>> I would like something closer to edit-config to be available via
>> RESTCONF as well.
> YANG Patch is IMO better because it clearly separates the target for the edits
> from the new content.

> In edit-config these two are mixed together.
Yes, that is primarily why I prefer the edit-config.  I perceive that it 
is a denser and more efficient format.  I think that it is both easier 
to construct (when diffing two trees) and also more efficient to apply 
when generating an updated tree.

Thanks,
Rob


>
> That being said, I support specifying format/media-type and having potentially
> multiple options.
>
> Lada
>
>> Thanks,
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>> /martin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>> .
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email