Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

<> Mon, 25 March 2019 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2FB1207E5 for <>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUUO_n4XLycZ for <>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2182112080B for <>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pencil (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C85A6046A; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: <>
To: "'Kent Watsen'" <>, <>
Cc: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:18:46 +0100
Message-ID: <01c201d4e347$f517d530$df477f90$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01C3_01D4E350.56DCD970"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQHkmOEFT8YFd3Eo+shRHFwVFU6uhKX9XfFQ
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 20:18:51 -0000

No, I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.





From: netmod <> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 8:35 PM
Subject: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01


To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line.

In order to complete the Adoption poll, are you aware of any IPR that applies
to draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01?  Please Reply-All to *this* email and

state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If "yes", has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If "yes" again, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by
responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR.  This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author
or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which
encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF
contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related
to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above

Thank you,
Kent // as co-chair