Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

+1, with Acee

Cheers,
Jeff

On 1/22/18, 08:18, "netmod on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:

    Hi Lada, 

    My primary concern is that the YANG Schema Mount delay will not only hold the NI/LNE but all the models that are dependent on them (e.g., L2VPN and L3VPN). This is for a document that has already finished WG Last Call. Additionally, your estimate for the size of the change and time to reach standardization is based on there being immediate consensus on the changes. This is probably overly optimistic given there was discussion on the proposed YANG Library BIS changes. I’d vote to publish the existing draft. 

    In any case, being able to see the proposed changes ASAP is critical. 

    Thanks,
    Acee

    On 1/22/18, 8:45 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka" <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:

        Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> writes:

        > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:05:15PM +0000, Robert Wilton wrote:
        >> 
        >> Hence, for me, I see the choice as:
        >> 1) do we publish the existing model now (perhaps also mark the draft as
        >> experimental) followed by an updated draft with the NMDA compatible module?
        >> 2) do we publish both models in a single draft (e.g. with the existing model
        >> in an appendix)?
        >> 3) do we only publish a single version of the draft with an NMDA compliant
        >> solution.
        >>
        >
        > I think the situation is as follows (likely obvious but it may help to
        > make sure we are all on the same page):
        >
        > - the NI and LNE models have a normative reference to
        >   I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount (and this makes sense since there are
        >   MUST sentences in the I-D)
        >
        > - I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount (last updated in October) has normative
        >   references to RFC 7895 (old YANG library)
        >
        > - RFC 7895 does not work with NMDA, NMDA work on a YANG library update
        >   replacing RFC 7895
        >
        > So the YANG library update is gating the schema mount update which is
        > gating the publication of the NI and LNE models.
        >
        > A proper solution would be to prioritize work on the YANG library
        > update and the schema mount update. I assume that the next revision of
        > the YANG library update (say end of January) is ready for WG last call
        > and perhaps the schema mount authors can take an effort to get that
        > document there as well, say beginning of February.

        I completely agree.

        Lada

        >
        > /js
        >
        > -- 
        > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
        > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
        > Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
        >
        > _______________________________________________
        > netmod mailing list
        > netmod@ietf.org
        > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

        -- 
        Ladislav Lhotka
        Head, CZ.NIC Labs
        PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

        _______________________________________________
        netmod mailing list
        netmod@ietf.org
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

    _______________________________________________
    netmod mailing list
    netmod@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod