[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2BC124D85 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:48:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJqSvdo4KGEm for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAAE1124B17 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:48:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1211; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513608514; x=1514818114; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=/clV36Bt3nfReQ3AvngSZcsBTwi95kUaOQ28FQHLfgg=; b=h3N6yQ6HK/GpjFqrspO1Rn0oDH1ga46yQLSQYBv69ft3ee+e5v8ZhxXu aycaUkRSLgQFUDlKA70iyDj+x5VDbSAWB9GXwTrywBEgKDBoCdFJ5JH5M sevqHf4aNGFCJIacrfgP9+gxWD5p3Q1JgqA3INC7Mj+ht2nCJvv61MzKm E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DqAQCo1Dda/xbLJq1cGgEBAQEBAgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEIAQEBAYQkdIQtixWhZYVkggEKI4pjFAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohRozdAE+Al8NCAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BiiYQqgWCJyaKQgEBAQEGAQEBAQEeBYNug2SCEoYxAQGBNYNNgmMFozyHf4Nxi?= =?us-ascii?q?TyMFYdejRuBWYgEgTs2IoFPMhoIGxWCZoRWQIpNAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,422,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217";a="993663"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Dec 2017 14:48:32 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBIEmVZV032158 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:48:32 GMT
To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <7966764e-0dfb-c8ca-3a70-490144ed52a0@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:48:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B647C3914A14F14943DD565C"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/OUWcD8ICNwPR00ylRdKHAuFt-q8>
Subject: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:48:35 -0000

Dear all,

In order not to be the bottleneck in the process, here is my AD review 
of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis/>
All looks good. Thank you.

Martin already noticed the Security Considerations template

Regards, Benoit (as OPS AD)