Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

Hi,


Actually I liked the early pyang output that was concise and easy to
remember.
The current format gets very cluttered and there are too many little symbols
to remember them all.


Andy


On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Joe Clarke <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I've been hacking on pyang, and I changed tree.py to add the enum values
> for enumeration types and identiyref bases for identityref types.  Here
> is an example:
>
> module: yang-catalog
>     +--rw catalog
>        +--rw modules
>        |  +--rw module* [name revision organization]
>        |     +--rw name                     yang:yang-identifier
>        |     +--rw revision                 union
>        |     +--rw organization             string
>        |     +--rw ietf
>        |     |  +--rw ietf-wg?   string
>        |     +--rw namespace                inet:uri
>        |     +--rw schema?                  inet:uri
>        |     +--rw generated-from?          enumeration [mib, code,
> not-applicable, native]
>        |     +--rw maturity-level?          enumeration [ratified,
> adopted, initial, not-applicable]
> ...
>                                +--rw protocols
>                                |  +--rw protocol* [name]
>                                |     +--rw name
> identityref -> protocol
> ...
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1. Is this useful?
>
> 2. If so, can this be added to pyang (happy to submit a PR) and
> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams?
>
> 3. What changes to the output format would you recommend?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>