Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 15 September 2017 12:54 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707FE1332C8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwFJA0Z6MpFH for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64730133211 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3050; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505480078; x=1506689678; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QYQkByvhXvk7b//oXxQIWLKdpiFxWMgenYxUexm9bRI=; b=NuU4nRGI4yiYukBwRFsRDXpzAxEgHssfxuw36bKtlipeP6N+Mv5BfJ/6 lYEDjvUUVehywsHvnRCgOva14rz+Kc77vtq9MN8ni1KEB1ch0hsdfQtNV 3lwvZnjk3iR0hZyxH2No2e4nSUstI/MQptSOC7TngxmmjSDfr8NyKm2Kb U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,396,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="655665276"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2017 12:54:36 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8FCsVsJ017256; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:54:31 GMT
To: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, andy@yumaworks.com
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
References: <9d84d068-29ba-8e89-394f-b7f6a5272adc@cisco.com> <CABCOCHQZ4zJ3p_4oB1Pu=1H60btzrccqTx7rUtsRsF0reXgrYw@mail.gmail.com> <20170914.195037.593298963545596882.mbj@tail-f.com> <5721c564-48e9-299e-5ada-b272b00716cf@cisco.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <748ca881-2180-3096-750d-44d28aa1b7ce@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:54:31 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5721c564-48e9-299e-5ada-b272b00716cf@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/OyJ1v-bQxy96Z3FXL_Olcr-rBtw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:54:40 -0000
Hi Joe, > On 9/14/17 13:50, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >> Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> Actually I liked the early pyang output that was concise and easy to >>> remember. >>> The current format gets very cluttered and there are too many little symbols >>> to remember them all. >> I agree with Andy. I also did some experiments with printing >> enumerations, and they work ok for small enums. But once you have >> more than a handful they do tend to clutter the output. Even worse so >> for trees that go into RFCs (where lines need to be < 70 characters). > What about protecting this with an optional parameter? I certainly > appreciate the output could be large, but I think it does have its uses > sometimes. I would agree it has its uses sometimes. And it helps the broader community with understanding YANG, this is good. Now, if you are already a YANG expert, I guess you don't use the tree output much. Regards, Benoit (as a contributor) > > Joe > >> Lada is sometimes using a format with even less information, where he >> has removed all type information, focusing more on the structure. >> >> >> /martin >> >> >> >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been hacking on pyang, and I changed tree.py to add the enum values >>>> for enumeration types and identiyref bases for identityref types. Here >>>> is an example: >>>> >>>> module: yang-catalog >>>> +--rw catalog >>>> +--rw modules >>>> | +--rw module* [name revision organization] >>>> | +--rw name yang:yang-identifier >>>> | +--rw revision union >>>> | +--rw organization string >>>> | +--rw ietf >>>> | | +--rw ietf-wg? string >>>> | +--rw namespace inet:uri >>>> | +--rw schema? inet:uri >>>> | +--rw generated-from? enumeration [mib, code, >>>> not-applicable, native] >>>> | +--rw maturity-level? enumeration [ratified, >>>> adopted, initial, not-applicable] >>>> ... >>>> +--rw protocols >>>> | +--rw protocol* [name] >>>> | +--rw name >>>> identityref -> protocol >>>> ... >>>> >>>> My questions are: >>>> >>>> 1. Is this useful? >>>> >>>> 2. If so, can this be added to pyang (happy to submit a PR) and >>>> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams? >>>> >>>> 3. What changes to the output format would you recommend? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> netmod mailing list >>>> netmod@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>> > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > . >
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Xufeng Liu