Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <> Tue, 02 October 2018 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C306130E89 for <>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6UE-gYt6TKL5 for <>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F46130E78 for <>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=3716; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538490368; x=1539699968; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=gqeBi6OHzPpFNlr2l+uoxUF223mWvPLfpnYgvMBSoPU=; b=milXKsGDJJkl3XDL4oVhD4Cwn83Eqv6uvl5WTUxiGAJArEPvP1/vdzM7 sOqsLO57JJPkp+Wg+uxd6aFRbYWEckfSLyD3FkwDmJoexj7VBnkAtt5Gp S7vvODIdpSLCNuXFIpWvnqhQtFHnTK1n9DVYwaBCWZ0WnP3MjrxXgK2IT Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,332,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="460348030"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2018 14:26:07 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w92EQ79h008120 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:26:07 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:26:06 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:26:06 -0500
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <>
To: Kent Watsen <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
Thread-Index: AQHUWkp2I2nNckn+1ky1f4oa9l5TQKULtr8AgABcxQA=
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:26:06 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:26:11 -0000

No objection, I support adoption of this document.


On 2018-10-02, 9:52 AM, "Kent Watsen" <> wrote:

    Hi Reshad, thanks for asking.
    It's a grey area.  It could go either way.  Both charters support the work.  The chairs are all 50/50 as for best fit.  Squinting, it seems more an NMDA-thing than a transport-thing (i.e., not NC or RC specific), and NETMOD is more the "NMDA group" than NETCONF, at least the first-order of it seems to be that way.
    That said, NETCONF is overloaded and NETMOD is not (14 vs 4 drafts).  Of course, similar people are in both working groups, but it would be good to offload some discussion from the NETCONF list and give this WG something more to work on.  I hope this is okay with everyone.
    With respect to the adoption poll.  The important thing here is if anyone objects.  Do you or anyone else object?
    Kent // chair
    -----Original Message-----
    From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <>
    Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 8:21 AM
    To: Kent Watsen <>, "" <>
    Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
    Kent, I may have asked this question in Montreal but I don't remember the answer: why is this document in NETMOD and not in NETCONF?
    On 2018-10-01, 2:48 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" < on behalf of> wrote:
        The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt
        this draft, and no objections.
        This email starts an adoption poll for:

        Please indicate your support or objection to the adoption poll. 
        If objecting, please state your reasons on this thread.
        Kent (and Lou and Joel)
        netmod mailing list