Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-08: (with DISCUSS)

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Hi Kent,

> On 28 Aug 2019, at 23:03, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> Response at bottom.
> 
> Kent
> 
> 
>> On Aug 28, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Alexey Melnikov via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-08: Discuss
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thank you for your document.
>> 
>> It might be just me, but I think your examples in 9.4.1 with trailing \ don’t
>> seem to match the folding algorithm in section 7, as it doesn’t describe
>> special handling of trailing \.
> 
> Can you be more specific regarding what it is you think doesn't match?   Step (2) says, at the location where the fold is to occur, insert '\' followed by '\n'.  That appears to be what is shown in 9.4.1, yes?

In the HTML version (in datatracker) I am seeing:

“This line ends with a backslash \\”
followed by an empty line. So I see 2 trailing \ followed by end of line, instead of \, end of line, and then \.
> 
> FWIW, the text in Section 9.4.1 (as with all the examples in the draft) was dynamically-generated (at draft build time) by feeding the text in Section 9.4 into the script in the Appendix A.
> 
> Kent  // co-author
> 
>