IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Thu, 31 March 2022 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C5F3A1803 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o26HiwQID05V for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B9B3A175E for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 64264 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2022 18:29:07 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=fb06.6245f2f3.k2203; bh=XUzX+keES4lcdnOZbicGzWNykCDaz79X7coOOlCASY0=; b=dp9HVe90wLZ5fM14pdEm1bC2XjrekOD7ykySuzIAh7ENNAYpkm4BUM/HIYCGLUt10fmnU9Fe+LEPAGzI/zAbDKFP9/i55YAe++2S9kVJ6aLLOGnYoZm+AMuDyZvqcbNapBvQ/Nwpj/2VnNPc8mUthm1/vzNDWo4gLeFJRY7B9AhWWAEN462cQYH6u56etMUvT5wtjN2fhHLxyMNU2fK6RWE6dQMxZ+vsq/oZf5yylR845l504uAFydBGMiPdJ/FSFjT1RxGW6cHJtukr8wJBkSbKx0mw8Ac0iJnY/CmRNs81wHbBFKw6+sbRS6JOpkPNAQPojxQsrIAyjg9QVykUAA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 31 Mar 2022 18:29:07 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id DC1073A1FC2D; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7E43A1FC0E; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:29:05 -0400
Message-ID: <d1356711-aca1-5f0a-b210-a7dbd3a961f9@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Cc: "rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <0100017fe1154a65-2daf3240-c428-4aeb-b43d-8f1fb2a61b3d-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <20220330212032.B1C784C1D2@rfcpa.amsl.com> <0100017fdcedaf32-a7793fc0-367f-4737-a505-6045ecfc74ed-000000@email.amazonses.com> <25000_1648704694_62453CB6_25000_113_1_315eaf0b15d04ffea9a7f1f5a7b07324@orange.com> <AM7PR07MB62483BF8820925D14E7609C3A0E19@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <f3673d5b-73d3-3274-f9bf-35f2f9646940@iecc.com> <CABCOCHSKXKjuBpytANO2WP9-mmJZ=Swtzz0M+0bKJvRBBZ1+ew@mail.gmail.com> <0100017fe1154a65-2daf3240-c428-4aeb-b43d-8f1fb2a61b3d-000000@email.amazonses.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Q1i8SLZKNQ-Ag_mkOuIH1jE-crU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:29:15 -0000

> I would hope that web-based RFCs would either default to showing the "current" RFC or provide an easy way for clients to be aware that a "current" version is available and get a link to it.

If you look at, say RFC 6376 at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6376

There's four links to versions of the RFC.  The fourth with the checkmark has errata applied,
with links at the top to the individual errata.

The regular HTML version has red "Errata Exist" at the top so you know to look for them.

Take a look.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email