[netmod] Re: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16

[Jürgen Schönwälder <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the review, Florian. I will add a reference to RFC 9499 to
the domain-name type definition.

/js

On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 03:14:48AM -0700, Florian Obser via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Florian Obser
> Review result: Ready
>

[...]

> 
> Changes relevant to the DNS are the introduction of a host-name type
> and using that type in the definition of the host type. Both changes
> are useful. In RFC 6991 the host type is too wide and domain-name type
> has some hand-wavy text about host names having stricter requirements
> than domain names.
> 
> Strictly speaking the domain-name type does not fully capture what is
> currently understood to be a domain name in the DNS, but the
> description of the type acknowledges this: "The pattern above is
> intended to allow for current practice in domain name use, and some
> possible future expansion." This seems sensible for a YANG type.
> 
> An informative reference to RFC 9499 - DNS Terminology would be
> useful.
> 
> I'm marking the draft "ready" from a dnsdir point of view.
> 

-- 
Jürgen Schönwälder              Constructor University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany