[netmod] 2nd WGLC on system-config-08

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Sun, 11 August 2024 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <0100019141c6c601-53d41832-302a-4589-9f75-f181bc2a4306-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA74C14F5FA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 07:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lAiuB0vNh33 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 07:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-110.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.110]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20BDC1519AF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2024 07:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1723385431; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Message-Id:Date:To:Feedback-ID; bh=5kmvk5Y0PuKFuvq+KanVZDCChIFfvOJTMacORl5ljZk=; b=b3Tn7DhwjoV/VCinEZzSWtwfvSjHFVbvwN4rDTneo55p/ToDmuhIQMumjp272MW3 A3wJaxBkEW/jY435IMzBJMHhI1FHJTO9jjVWX3smZXZSg3Of3KJl2hAbGpZKgKP2IGe z5pp+2fe3eRJfT0cdmNCkL6oTkrg/z61/N2MdSZ8=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_211B7C62-E648-4D80-BF7C-6CD2FACAD320"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
Message-ID: <0100019141c6c601-53d41832-302a-4589-9f75-f181bc2a4306-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 14:10:31 +0000
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: ::1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.08.11-54.240.48.110
Message-ID-Hash: DXA4PJKMYZTLSIDZL2KGKEGQVVZEGRUM
X-Message-ID-Hash: DXA4PJKMYZTLSIDZL2KGKEGQVVZEGRUM
X-MailFrom: 0100019141c6c601-53d41832-302a-4589-9f75-f181bc2a4306-000000@amazonses.watsen.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netmod.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [netmod] 2nd WGLC on system-config-08
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Q9MQzdwjmNJTanrP6FJjg9n71Yw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netmod-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netmod-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netmod-leave@ietf.org>

NETMOD WG,

We did a WGLC in May on the -05 version of this document.  The diffs since then are substantial (https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-netmod-system-config-05&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-system-config-08&difftype=--html) and so it seems prudent to run a fresh WGLC on this document now.

This email begins a two-week WGLC on:

	System-defined Configuration
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-system-config-08

Please take time to review this draft and post comments by August 25.  Whilst favorable comments are welcomed, given that this document already has a lot of support, the primary focus now is to determine if there are any objections or concerns.   If no objections or concerns are raised, this document will automatically progress to the next step.

From the IPR poll in March, there is no known IPR for this document:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/IpzWIAbgifXoKaNfLhEDmYbyXkY/

Kent  // co-chair