[netmod] tree diagram guidelines
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 09:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BF11287A7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 01:14:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njJu5zcIdc5l for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 01:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE35126C0F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 01:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (h-40-225.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.40.225]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 717961AE0311 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:14:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:14:54 +0100
Message-Id: <20171115.101454.1576716701146734257.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Q9k5ZY0Xat52-r7MHAi8OO5LnkE>
Subject: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:14:57 -0000
Hi, There was a proposal in the meeting today to have the guidelines for tree diagrams in a wiki, instead of having them in 6087bis or in the tree diagram document. Was the proposal really to have a wiki for just the tree guidelines, or was the proposal to withdraw 6087bis from the process and instead publish all guidelines as a wiki? If it is the former, is it really worth it? Advantages with a wiki: + It can be updated more easily Some drawbacks: - It can be updated more easily (meaning they are less stable) - Wikis tend to not be alive after some time, and are not that easy to find. Just try to find the various YANG-related wikis we've tried to maintain over the years. - Links in RFCs also have problems. Sites are re-orginized etc. As an example, the link to the security guidelines template in RFC 6087 doesn't work anymore. - People that are looking for a stable reference will have problems (I think Rob mentioned that IEEE still refer to RFC 6087 (which is understandable; that's the published version). - Who maintains the Wiki, and what are the rules for updating it? I suggest we have the tree-related guidelines (actually just a few sentences) in the tree draft, and since 6087bis already refers to this document it is not a big problem that guidelines are spread out over several documents that are difficult to find. /martin
- [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Mehmet Ersue
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Mehmet Ersue
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Mehmet Ersue
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Susan Hares
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines Andy Bierman