IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Fri, 09 March 2018 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14121274D2; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:22:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0S0ZLvbFfiaa; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5481120047; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w29KJVWv030272; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:22:48 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=o6mI7uruI79CgAcgKpg5xisIdztNJnK8UMalWpSxoQE=; b=nUHhbqTCkplI4tlHgSoy23Da5HxvH9luXzXFfthg0o9a/HvKlsw9qp378nyNkJ/5nijf gRt8v0AD9PxdhMoW8kRgXu0ucT0y7ZG9KdRrGLPgh8OCndyJC06I+49uOHxCfH3cLFi2 VBAJ8c8kRsMInu1nXPqR1sQdyPkXBC56OIJ4UTIbJahpS9RbnCPT5w+iXEw4Y/v+ZIi6 PlbHWMiqPv2utsb3fxTLOn4N2cXGJZAZ2fD3ULgzPrjpvA71omSHMJO6qT4VwPDz5uZu +ZBe8LzvI/C8lok+i6iIoXgt8wQcpPvqov4Znr+tNm1/ju1wKoRjxvqz3YRWZEBgWZTg iw==
Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp0079.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.79]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gkvs5gf3h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:22:48 -0800
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.240.147) by DM5PR05MB3260.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.220.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.588.7; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:22:47 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d13e:bdcf:3798:c34f]) by DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d13e:bdcf:3798:c34f%2]) with mapi id 15.20.0588.001; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:22:47 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTtsB2yu4y7fLctE65O6yWoW/ILqPGwrOAgABBnYCAAAOzAIAAanWAgACEHwCAABm+AIAAA0iA///z1QA=
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:22:47 +0000
Message-ID: <34F38DF5-D7A3-493F-BA64-C4D14B2419EA@juniper.net>
References: <152050158005.21412.3389388204390015375.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABCOCHSmCioJPNM5b9J-5WCsXe_J2jMzKKCD8fw02uh-D5nNdA@mail.gmail.com> <e627d122-a709-c41c-b58a-b5890b8d2103@nostrum.com> <CABCOCHSLAKZCyACHgQvdqU6TLLdLBtY9izh7+2Pi4Qc3Z2-Sjw@mail.gmail.com> <20180309062933.oeitoohvvowfjh2b@elstar.local> <1ca7deec-3dbd-cbed-d70b-ce043a1714ee@cisco.com> <20180309155434.ufspajrfqskw77o4@elstar.local> <CABCOCHR41Lsg5=5oNeXhTT2N0kCU=k1nGeBk2VJaKaDxzTMp+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHR41Lsg5=5oNeXhTT2N0kCU=k1nGeBk2VJaKaDxzTMp+g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3260; 7:kbShOLuBwefkX9xWRMW8zgKcaSf5AT5icze/h3gamR8uhZKEALBPy8RBZ0Dq9oskbcDxx/ZoX4esgeY0F3XEwBiZgC+rbNam6zDnqV/ls2KZ2YHkRSUPtp5jdVU/OJi4P4b1eG35sEj0LQDG44ipiZCk6qt9fskYIGs631YalSHaYCy6+I4g21GA1nrOkhAttm4IyVxomuB6QZqFNY0+MLXHrl8raNBb3a1Tp1A1UdjB0g7OYIX8me3z/tW7IdFl
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 999bbd91-0829-406e-1b76-08d585fb85ca
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3260;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3260:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3260D50D43381240312B1156A5DE0@DM5PR05MB3260.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3231220)(944501244)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041310)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3260; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3260;
x-forefront-prvs: 0606BBEB39
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(366004)(39380400002)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(199004)(189003)(66066001)(478600001)(82746002)(6436002)(14454004)(97736004)(99286004)(6246003)(102836004)(36756003)(5250100002)(105586002)(6116002)(8936002)(2950100002)(58126008)(7736002)(3660700001)(2900100001)(83716003)(110136005)(3280700002)(3846002)(2501003)(81156014)(68736007)(33656002)(81166006)(6512007)(86362001)(2906002)(5660300001)(26005)(8676002)(186003)(25786009)(93886005)(76176011)(106356001)(316002)(6506007)(6306002)(6486002)(54896002)(229853002)(53936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3260; H:DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: m3zClSJ5MZRSXr92WQw7X7X2btud6Puy4uy+i6Uc8v3toyD+TCf42wulICbVK6qmIupfZdaCk2hGqKXSg5MUy/Jpf5Tyr8KWBXf52UmadJBwSGQjXfuT9uBQ5m+WFoGqE2WgLqKJR5aMfNgqQ+FBxeEDfMntIQ/ttdgKcYE20oZ80EeKul/+JqMWRXuJHs0xN7Kz9rR2dtMsAEkL7snvg8p89wM8CkDb2HROwpaqQTqEMJObaGyLiVymY3n4ID2qxmquXS1fNXCuIfMZkkK32B8hlg/EYanKH5RMSaQ5Jk/zPrMes1PF81uAlh7AuMqVqcp0apUnvgCf3btG+HfpIg==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_34F38DF5D7A3493FBA64C4D14B2419EAjunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 999bbd91-0829-406e-1b76-08d585fb85ca
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Mar 2018 20:22:47.0224 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3260
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-09_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1803090241
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Qm31FYfXyMuuOwtwqS7SlCm4XUI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:22:52 -0000

> I came up with 2 sentences to add to 6087bis:
>
> #1)
>
> If the patterns used in a type definition have known limitations
> such as false positive matches, then these limitations
> SHOULD be documented within the typedef or data definition.


I like this, but it would be better to also mention false-negative
matches, as it gets people to think about the other side too.


> #2)
>
> Simpler patterns SHOULD be used instead of more complex variants,
> if possible, because they are easier to read.

I think we should stay silent on this point.   Maybe we could that there is
a known tradeoff between pattern complexity and verifiability, which is
left to the module designer as a consideration.


> Andy

Kent

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email