[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 (5105)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 01 September 2017 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA1A13419C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 07:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zx_IBZwqjWNt for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988911330B5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 60AC4B80E23; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, bclaise@cisco.com, warren@kumari.net, kwatsen@juniper.net, lberger@labn.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: lhotka@nic.cz, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170901144056.60AC4B80E23@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:40:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/QonDiN9cKVqPdh05YcIKmHNmjkM>
Subject: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6991 (5105)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:40:58 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6991,
"Common YANG Data Types".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5105

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>

Section: 3

Original Text
-------------
A schema node of this type will be set to zero (0) on creation
and will thereafter increase monotonically until it reaches
a maximum value of 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal), when it
wraps around and starts increasing again from zero.

Corrected Text
--------------
A leaf instance of this type will be set to zero (0) on creation
and will thereafter increase monotonically until it reaches
a maximum value of 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal), when it
wraps around and starts increasing again from zero.

Notes
-----
In a number of descriptions in both ietf-yang-types and ietf-inet-types, the term "schema node" is used incorrectly in places where "leaf instance" or "instance of a leaf" should be used instead. However, not all occurences of "schema node" are wrong: schema nodes just have to be distinguished from nodes in an instance data tree.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6991 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Common YANG Data Types
Publication Date    : July 2013
Author(s)           : J. Schoenwaelder, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : NETCONF Data Modeling Language
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG