Re: [netmod] WGLC - Comparison of NMDA datastores - draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 09 March 2020 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA753A0C3C; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBkneJnQCm4d; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A2D33A0C3A; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jmbp.local ([IPv6:2601:647:4200:5811:640e:4698:df4:c0eb]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 0290AneA021955; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 00:10:49 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host [IPv6:2601:647:4200:5811:640e:4698:df4:c0eb] claimed to be jmbp.local
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: netmod@ietf.org, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <687b863b-4d54-db67-e3af-b08588c85360@bogus.com>
X-Pep-Version: 2.0
Message-ID: <1cd1d7f0-3431-101e-0289-de382353a6e8@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:10:48 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <687b863b-4d54-db67-e3af-b08588c85360@bogus.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------5CFE7EB06AE0E3637A233BE7"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/RIYCAY6fUpAru0_Gy_fDuQ85hKo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC - Comparison of NMDA datastores - draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 00:11:09 -0000

This working group last call completed on March 2nd.

Some corrections, and adjustments were requested in the discussion
between Juergen and Alex. 

While the last call window did not see a lot of postive or negative
support it aligns well with the dicussion at the last meeting on
readiness to advance. I think we can call consensus on this point.

if a draft 04 appears shortly addressing the changes that were made I
think we can move it along.

Thanks

joel

On 2/17/20 11:42, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This was supposed to get processed shortly after IETF 106, however I lost track of it. We are therefore running a 2 week WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff/
>
> the 02 - 03 diff is available here:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-02&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03
>
> Please send email to the list indicating your support or concerns.
>
> This WGLC will conclude Monday March 2nd.
>
>
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>