IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 30 August 2017 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD832132620 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 02:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ouiyBFXNAgZb for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 02:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589EE1323F7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 02:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy10.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DD714054D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 03:29:17 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 3MVE1w00W2SSUrH01MVHVy; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 03:29:17 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=G8xsK5s5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=KeKAF7QvOSUA:10 a=u07AKapRAAAA:8 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=B4eHQB-JjU6rmOT_XCgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=SkebfZ6J2Mmvk2rLHZle:22 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1+4HyxbqOkBZPx1DmDvFIP/RP2qb9ei7w7Eio/GR0u8=; b=0hRAYwIXQ4iMq76sts4j+l2aQW moixZ8ChETn+DQSV2E7/EJ7RPwSb4nJiBTaMF5z/Zq0W4XfJAW8zPFPFaRrt9cor5Q/dEHexGbduN qZhX7P9sDHd33PAX/cACVzdwc;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:42875 helo=[11.4.0.6]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dmzJC-0033ol-DO; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 03:29:14 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, lhotka@nic.cz
CC: netmod@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 05:29:12 -0400
Message-ID: <15e32791e40.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170830.094028.1809893324608957744.mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <1503929779.1715.65.camel@nic.cz> <81b138c6-9941-3313-979c-61edad7819a7@labn.net> <87shgacvrb.fsf@nic.cz> <20170830.094028.1809893324608957744.mbj@tail-f.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.10.0-403 (build: 101000001)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dmzJC-0033ol-DO
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.4.0.6]) [100.15.84.20]:42875
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/RN--4u_wRppXc0bESmAoTEbyhHQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:29:20 -0000

FYI I've asked folks in the routing area, i.e., the ietf users of schema 
mount, if they have an opinion on the node discussion. I will also do so on 
the point I raised on parent reference location. (Which is independent from 
your format change.) Clearly, if I'm the only one to be raising objections, 
I'll be the one in the rough on these points.

Thanks,

Lou
- as contributor


On August 30, 2017 3:42:26 AM Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

> Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
>> Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> writes:
>>
>> > Lada,
>> >
>> >
>> > On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> >> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
>
> [...]
>
>> >>> PS is your view aligned with martin or our example?
>> >> If you mean shifting the XPath context node to the mount point instance, 
>> then
>> >> yes.
>
> So, going back to the original issue; does anyone have any objection
> to changing the XPath context for parent-reference as describied in my
> original post?
>
>
> /martin
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email