Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Mon, 18 December 2017 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E24126CBF; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:55:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SR53-lZKpshm; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:55:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (trail.lhotka.name [77.48.224.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A60C120727; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix, from userid 109) id A567B18203FB; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:19:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (unknown [195.113.220.121]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6C4418203F5; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:19:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: "Acee Lindem \(acee\)" <acee@cisco.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <D65C0ACB.E2B1E%acee@cisco.com>
References: <8568e55c-29c6-272e-dd9f-7d1b150edba6@labn.net> <44e5318a-4157-b825-b688-5185ab2458cb@labn.net> <D65C0ACB.E2B1E%acee@cisco.com>
Mail-Followup-To: "Acee Lindem \(acee\)" <acee@cisco.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:19:42 +0100
Message-ID: <8737482ppd.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/RY5Zn8QE3Q1hmdRQ9etKu5-8wwY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:55:38 -0000

Hi Acee,

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>; writes:

> Hi Lou, et al, 
>
> The only issue we are struggling with is whether we need to specify the
> version in the ietf-interfaces import. We have noted that
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01.txt does not import by revision.

I would suggest to import *without* revision but add a description
indicating that the NMDA-compatible revisions are needed.

Importing by revision is clearly suboptimal. Hopefully a new mechanism
such as semantic versioning will be introduced soon to alleviate this
issue.

>
> We also have so nits:
>
>    1. Add an informative reference for
> [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams].
>    2. Based on a comment from Vladimir, we added the prefix for
> ietf-routing.yang, “rt:”, to several references within ietf-routing.yang.
> Was this necessary? Of course, the model compiles with or without the
> prefix.

RFC6087bis has some rules in sec. 4.2, and these should be followed.

Also, the security considerations should IMO be changed, see my recent
message:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg19610.html

Of course, the NEW formulation needn't be exactly as I suggested, but
the text "The YANG module [...] is designed to be accessed ..." is
apparently wrong and shouldn't be used any more.

Thanks, Lada

>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 12/15/17, 3:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger"
> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lberger@labn.net>; wrote:
>
>>All,
>>	This last call is closed.
>>
>>We note that there was an update during the LC and that no comments were
>>received during the LC period.  As this is simply a mechanical update
>>that has been discussed in the WG we plan to proceed with the
>>publication process.
>>
>>Authors,
>>	Please let/us the WG know when you have published a version ready for
>>publication.  Also please let the WG know what has changed in the
>>document since the start of LC (rev -01)
>>
>>Thank you,
>>NetMod Chairs
>>
>>
>>
>>On 11/29/2017 12:26 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> This starts a two-week working group last call on
>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.
>>> 
>>> Please recall that this update's intention is to
>>> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
>>> guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two
>>> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
>>> 
>>> The working group last call ends on December 13.
>>> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>>> 
>>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
>>> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
>>> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
>>> [2] 
>>>https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=rfc8022.txt&url2=dr
>>>aft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.txt
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Netmod Chairs
>>> 
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>netmod mailing list
>>netmod@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67