IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-06

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 13 April 2022 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E0D3A0B9B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jdh-4a3KOyeu for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CEC93A0B90 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23DJIWws014161; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:18:32 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7103B4604C; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:18:30 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42AB46095; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:17:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:17:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (205.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.205] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 23DJHi1L021922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:17:45 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Qin Wu' <bill.wu@huawei.com>, 'Kent Watsen' <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <448cca5abaaf4e298cd5215cf5c51abb@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <448cca5abaaf4e298cd5215cf5c51abb@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:17:43 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0aa701d84f6b$27ae02c0$770a0840$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0AA8_01D84F73.8972DFF0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGEQAqBpOgJlSucL2tjg3+v7VFtAK2WTDng
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.205
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1000-26832.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.241-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--18.241-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1000-26832.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--18.241100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: vbSD0OnL8/LxIbpQ8BhdbI61Z+HJnvsOBMdp5178zSP5q5JB+ib2Qaq3 7hVCqLMtidsPY1asxdto0kiDJMs9TKGDMgFJdihf0e7jfBjhB8eOQOsE4nDCdLXl40gTGJ5ph+t oLLKXwRF44tU5RItIpjAAnSut5Z63vNOynLtydfUTuwt1FVoaZ99WrDP4LKdpnSgPkvDdtOgSpK YPHUJnSpCJSqC8FQVQPA1qQZtQo2U5jS4V09dQzlICmG2RRehovO61PPXizymZwdqszN1DlMTr/ G24o7RrqjbqKM7gD/kF8O3PoMprwnbXnT7gULmTIj0zFI5DoJLCXeHJwJcT9lCd7VOgbE3o+qwO bAztNgxU1xB5SaFW0yqFmu/h/tw7CkBHQ7k87pIOsNNBnlgRWn0tCKdnhB58r10pknZXGJrJ4y0 wP1A6AB8AKgKWeNGh0KkIUsNMdlRq8/xv2Um1aiUIayx+Skid
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Rbq2BnzIGxY4o_FTgozoQD-wglc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-06
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 19:18:49 -0000

Hi Qin,

 

Very good. Thanks for this. Almost perfect convergence.

 

Just one point left.

 

9.1

 

   This registry allocates tag prefixes.  All YANG Data Object Tags

   should begin with one of the prefixes in this registry.

 

That's not quite true, is it? 

 

[Qin Wu] I think this is recommendation for all YANG data node tags
beginning with one of prefixed in this registry,

Maybe we should use RFC2119 language,e.g., replace 'should'with 'SHOULD'?

 

Ah, sorry, I wasn't clear.

The user tags are Data Objects Tags, but they don't have to begin with a
prefix. 

Since this section is IANA instructions, it isn't really appropriate to use
2119 language.

 

I think, re-reading the whole of Section 9.1 again, maybe this paragraph
isn't actually necessary at all. It doesn't tell IANA anything they need to
know, and it doesn't cover anything that isn't already covered elsewhere in
the document.

 

Best,

Adrian

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status