Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Tue, 16 October 2018 12:45 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF3E130DC9; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ux47fqLRb4hn; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4474A130DE1; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A74611AE0498; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:45:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:45:45 +0200
Message-Id: <20181016.144545.1184951335260453665.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: ekr@rtfm.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, joelja@gmail.com, draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount@ietf.org, kwatsen@juniper.net, lberger@labn.net
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNZ+AMXXNu7C5nvxie6NmJdJ_6FbHJXtdkxnMAN3rNGHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBMJmM_NaRY3GzcV4HO+BB14ooqxJ9oGrrer6nx3ZAqMxw@mail.gmail.com> <20181011.091817.1727547509052700274.mbj@tail-f.com> <CABcZeBNZ+AMXXNu7C5nvxie6NmJdJ_6FbHJXtdkxnMAN3rNGHQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/SVYqr8PEnXZ3lUfQEqWHoBKZmq4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:45:51 -0000
Hi, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > That seems like it's going to have some pretty surprising consequences and > at minimum needs more information in the Security Considerations. Ok. Howabout we add a paragraph to the end of the Security Considerations section: Care must be taken when the "parent-reference" XPath expressions are constructed, since the result of the evaluation of these expressions is added to the accessible tree for any XPath expression found in the mounted schema. /martin > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:18 AM Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote: > > > Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > I'm sorry but I don't understand this. > > > > > > Does the externally visible behavior of any mounted module depend in any > > > way on these XPATH references > > > > Yes, but note that these XPath expressions ("parent-reference") are > > read-only (config false in the YANG model). Thus they are set by the > > implementation, and used to inform the operator about the environment > > in which other XPath expressions are evaluated. > > > > > > /martin > > > > > > > > > > -Ekr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:38 AM Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:32 AM Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > > > > > > > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Discuss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply > > to all > > > > > > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to > > cut > > > > this > > > > > > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please refer to > > > > > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > > > > > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found > > here: > > > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > DISCUSS: > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rich version of this review at: > > > > > > > https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D3506 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DETAIL > > > > > > > S 4. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is worth emphasizing that the nodes specified in > > > > > > > > "parent-reference" leaf-list are available in the mounted > > > > schema > > > > > > only > > > > > > > > for XPath evaluations. In particular, they cannot be > > accessed > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > via network management protocols such as NETCONF > > [RFC6241] or > > > > > > > > RESTCONF [RFC8040]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What are the security implications of this XPath reference > > outside > > > > the > > > > > > > mount jail? Specifically, how does it interact with the access > > > > control > > > > > > > for the enclosing module. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such interaction, since access control comes into play > > > > > > when some external entity accesses the data through some management > > > > > > protocol, and the nodes from the "parent-reference" expressions > > cannot > > > > > > be accessed via management protocols. > > > > > > > > > > > > The last sentence of the quoted paragraph was supposed to make this > > > > > > clear, but it seems we might need some additional explanation? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I think so. I guess I'm not clear on what the XPath expressions > > are > > > > > for if they > > > > > can't be accessed via the management protocols. How can they be used? > > > > > > > > These are XPath expressions defined in the YANG models themselves, > > > > such as "must" expressions or "leafrefs". The description of > > > > "parent-reference" refer to them as: > > > > > > > > [...] XPath > > > > expressions whose context nodes are defined in the > > > > mounted schema > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /martin > > > > > >
- [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-ne… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… joel jaeggli
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… joel jaeggli
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-iet… Martin Bjorklund