Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 18 January 2023 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4DEC151555 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVjwbr-ilrmF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DA11C14F72D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id y3-20020a17090a390300b00229add7bb36so3221351pjb.4 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7LTkDdz5WFR9bTvKPqGtwtptoTT7hKGTsbb32iAl8xo=; b=Od+OhN56F0w5kJaC/YpAGlOPZccX38NC53boToUBegEGcRAOoA6bCdZaGZGCtww81y k/wC8QFgCFKn/6N1ls1/MsgOCR05y4UxiQmr4hgG3rb5fBCtG5+VJoiQZUODKpjqj6wM /BF04EQD1hj8AzFApvc88GiNsHvYPVvZW9M1XZstALf9Ws/WMOlGZJeBcYH24+HUcG6z jnUBDS8zNhcSRAGYVY589vkgm/giGeJOLGfbrjF+cK33rqSvxlJbGf/TGLlCs/MfUUz4 OE04gJ6xb3biMw9IUVobaCIPiwfIDAqCjgKmKdz045NC4vRdrAglLs7shrUCkwenpg9G Z2GQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7LTkDdz5WFR9bTvKPqGtwtptoTT7hKGTsbb32iAl8xo=; b=KdQ/RS/tizxZ4pt/TluZr1tBGsFlTFsDzVU4LUJOcuwWBXdtkqoSZoELgz1zAcDZxL otArbviVGli/F3fHl8LlE7nql+Xf29dOw0nZ57OabunCcRalonS4y5OR/cunduB6bgHb dlyKq5zVfhBXONkTfDc/33pEsDky2rXeStTzgOFn/6YyZz5o7aNxx9h2qjlnril1u7+B UXq6lT2jMO+fIqlq+tZESV6l96MQvCRDtEr5XxlJ3iio6UG9DdrIAUreVKtVbLvajPof tRRta9BcRZrTGshF4EzUdbIEzMa7elZi8+yTpMp408cJ+/seYnvodXgE2DfvukaFdCWs fUig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqHqxfAaTivhVvvoViJc5jqBLTQmUd4tYxyLteHBffWYONOudzE KJVES4cnWOpntKWQ/Pf6ipM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvXkwRiPSIFlMYkKGNfzsQ39K8P73BnSaN5fqvhMU8EbvQNIQqoZ2X0u3wJAQYAk35OtXOY2w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7b85:b0:193:3bf7:40e6 with SMTP id w5-20020a1709027b8500b001933bf740e6mr6924820pll.53.1674070982397; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-69-181-169-15.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.169.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ja15-20020a170902efcf00b0019493c84880sm6339128plb.188.2023.01.18.11.43.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:43:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <00A3BE14-30BF-4C4E-80BE-4291AA77E41F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B3B53923-3305-4404-AAB2-EA9565AED429"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:42:59 -0800
In-Reply-To: <23915_1674068585_63C84269_23915_94_1_492cbf63d10e4ed9b5b8165c0356418f@orange.com>
Cc: netmod <netmod@ietf.org>, Sonal Agarwal <sagarwal12@gmail.com>, "huangyi_99@yahoo.com" <huangyi_99@yahoo.com>, "dana@blairhome.com" <dana@blairhome.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
References: <20230118150200.47D905DC927@rfcpa.amsl.com> <AD517B52-3682-4B93-8683-E34C4675926C@gmail.com> <23915_1674068585_63C84269_23915_94_1_492cbf63d10e4ed9b5b8165c0356418f@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/SoQuoHm1YnGIPQPm1uI_8roGzKw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 19:43:06 -0000
In that case, yes, this errata should be accepted. > On Jan 18, 2023, at 11:03 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, > > I also recall some of that discussion… but that is not related to this erratum given the following prefix used in the import: > > CURRENT: > import ietf-access-control-list { > prefix acl; > } > > Cheers, > Med > > De : Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> > Envoyé : mercredi 18 janvier 2023 19:32 > À : netmod <netmod@ietf.org> > Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; Sonal Agarwal <sagarwal12@gmail.com>; huangyi_99@yahoo.com; dana@blairhome.com > Objet : Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313) > > There was a lot of discussion on the usage of what prefix should be used when importing a module, possibly after this draft was published. However, it is a BCP, and most tools will not complain if a prefix other than what is defined in the module is used. I am not sure if a BCP rises to the level of an errata. > > Thanks. > > > On Jan 18, 2023, at 7:02 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519, > "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313> > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>> > > Section: A.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl. In > this example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/ > ietf-acl:matches are augmented with two new choices: protocol- > payload-choice and metadata. The protocol-payload-choice uses a > grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values. > Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are > not in the packet header, such as overall packet length. In another > example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/ > ietf-acl:actions are augmented with a new choice of actions. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl. In > this example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:matches > are augmented with two new choices: protocol-payload-choice and > metadata. The protocol-payload-choice uses a > grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values. > Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are > not in the packet header, such as overall packet length. In another > example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:actions > are augmented with a new choice of actions. > > Notes > ----- > The prefix is "acl" not "ietf-acl" > > == > module ietf-access-control-list { > yang-version 1.1; > namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list"; > prefix acl; > ... > == > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8519 (draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21) > -------------------------------------- > Title : YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs) > Publication Date : March 2019 > Author(s) : M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, L. Huang, D. Blair > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Modeling > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > > Mahesh Jethanandani > mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com> > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (731… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Chris Smiley