Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 30 May 2018 01:56 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2E812ECB9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8wKgYFyEL70 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CC212EC05 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DC82718C16333; Wed, 30 May 2018 02:56:25 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 30 May 2018 02:56:26 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.193]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Wed, 30 May 2018 09:56:15 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query
Thread-Index: AQHT9zOXH0Q7uD0JNkiP7Q3mI4ni1KRF/2gAgAAGLQCAAAYEAIAACscAgAFsZWA=
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 01:56:14 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AE91441@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB23B2@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <71e76c7e-4043-d80a-73ac-1759e85cc5d7@cisco.com> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB241F@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20180529110610.4rcqvp7x4qpbg5hz@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB2484@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20180529120616.bxl4xyftqsvpsbxo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20180529120616.bxl4xyftqsvpsbxo@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.33.244]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Spv7vBVPbzNazzvkoBBLvJKovWA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 01:56:32 -0000
Juergen: One stupid question I have is, What about the old client and server still support YANG 1.0 since RFC7895bis is designed to replaces RFC7895? Do we have transition stage before RFC7895bis takes effect? -Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Juergen Schoenwaelder 发送时间: 2018年5月29日 20:06 收件人: Rohit R Ranade 抄送: netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query Yes, this is why we have draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt. /js On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:27:42AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > Consider a device supports a dynamic data-store called "ephemeral". Consider Yang-library 1.1 is NOT implemented in device. > Consider device have 3 Modules ==> Module1 , Module2-state and > Module3 > > Module1 : Supported in <running> and <operational> Module2-state : > Supported only in <operational> > Module3 : Supported only in <ephemeral> > > So here assumption is that Client knows he cannot do <edit-data> on Module2-state as it has only read-only nodes. > But Client does not know the modules in ephemeral and depends on yang-library 1.1 to know whether an edit-data can be done on Module3 ? > > Which modules are supported in which data-stores is not known to Client without Yang-library 1.1 ? > > With Regards, > Rohit R Ranade > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder > [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] > Sent: 29 May 2018 16:36 > To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> > Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:44:04AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > The Introduction section has : > > " > > Furthermore, the operational state datastore may support non-configurable YANG modules in addition to > > the YANG modules supported by conventional configuration datastores. > > " > > I infer that in the new Yang-library structure, the schema for "conventional" data-stores should not include the non-configurable YANG module. Is my inference correct ? > > > > A module that has only config false nodes will not add anything to a conventional configuration datastore but it is not an error list such a module. For a simple devices, it may be desirable to have just one schema that applies to all datastores. There is no requirement to break things apart just because there is a module that contributes only an empty set to conventional configuration datastores. > > Note that the defined term is 'conventional configuration datastore' > and not 'conventional datastore'. Oops, I see that in one place draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt missing the 'configuration' part of the term. That should be fixed. > > OLD > > The recommended approach to populate "/modules-state" is to report > the schema for YANG modules that are configurable via conventional > datastores and for which config false data nodes are returned via a > NETCONF <get> operation, or equivalent. > > NEW > > The recommended approach to populate "/modules-state" is to report > the schema for YANG modules that are configurable via conventional > configuration datastores and for which config false data nodes are > returned via a NETCONF <get> operation, or equivalent. > > Co-authors, if you agree, how do we track this? > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviati… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 dev… Juergen Schoenwaelder