Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 23:20 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3341A0404 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:20:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-GXYx5heaal for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com (mail-qg0-f43.google.com [209.85.192.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DDFD1A0263 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id f51so11530211qge.30 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:20:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f7J4SqG5mtj0Zk2HLqad62HZF5zCOxcks4gyG/gbobM=; b=DOd/ICJT6b5dDiwvb5KDNhWN+Blz+/YCLVk/nmcroWN1yNYRXB6mRf2J1Kx8o8JgNC MGL1wfdr7dTVkV/+t4XR+4mwLOgvXDBmAYrC+pz6DbHUBpMmQvp6btG6gdiI/6nNwIbC QCbpJXlZTqCgOpvawqamq6+I1V+Ff05EgAQr24o7Ubj32wz43I/JHy3zfqpACmSytolO DSAfyRUQrm/DNC3bItvMePhID9fqTfrVxrLEGcpHMXxpElrujVcJTM2nLAEwsYJB4aUS tZTDD+h4Vw68xSJb4me459jGiuebPprIqlrK6PpVtX+HtnUCh1Ca00jdZmfOoAM9MsL6 Q0DA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlezz3Ae7rcHFYC3q6MC1SvpaX5I26Pck9GLatnZQCZIVxomEREoxkUE2Nrug4lkySOvDE+
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.134.198 with SMTP id k6mr55594313qat.88.1415143231356; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:20:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.37.52 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:20:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54595361.5000907@cisco.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com> <54590195.3010903@cisco.com> <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com> <54595361.5000907@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:20:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHSqWWPDyTWXMj3+DUJ89GGCiHD6mhK3W7bJf-+VgS_cRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/TFOkYWA6z_tGyoubAApw62dkpA4
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:20:35 -0000
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: > Mahesh, > > Benoit, > > I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is being > presented/discussed in its own WG. > > I wonder which ideal outcome you want a presentation in the NETMOD WG? > > Here's the list of drafts that have normative or unclassified references to > YANG: > > draft-vanderstok-core-comi-05 2014-10-27 Active > draft-shi-alto-yang-json-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-shi-alto-yang-model-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05 2014-10-27 Active > draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-active-active-cfg-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-zaalouk-supa-configuration-model-01 2014-10-27 Active > draft-wang-lime-rpc-yang-oam-management-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-vergara-flexigrid-yang-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-gandhi-mpls-te-yang-model-01 2014-10-27 Active > draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-01 2014-10-27 Active > draft-zheng-netmod-xmi-yang-translation-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-info-model-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-tripathy-cloud-sla-yang-model-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-l3-topo-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-contreras-supa-yang-network-topo-01 2014-10-27 Active > draft-wang-yang-bfd-oam-00 2014-10-27 Active > draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04 2014-10-26 Active > draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01 2014-10-26 Active > draft-shen-l2tpext-l2tpv3-yang-model-00 2014-10-26 Active > draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 2014-10-26 Active > draft-shaikh-idr-bgp-model-00 2014-10-26 Active > draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-03 2014-10-25 Active > draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-01 2014-10-25 Active > draft-sarikaya-dmm-for-wifi-01 2014-10-24 Active > draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-01 2014-10-24 Active > draft-shi-model-json-msg-yang-00 2014-10-24 Active > draft-liu-pim-igmp-mld-yang-00 2014-10-23 Active > draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-01 2014-10-23 Active > draft-liu-pim-yang-00 2014-10-23 Active > draft-asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model-00 2014-10-22 Active > draft-dong-i2rs-l2-network-topology-00 2014-10-21 Active > draft-bierman-netconf-efficiency-extensions-02 2014-10-21 Active > draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-cfg-00 2014-10-21 Active > draft-sun-softwire-yang-00 2014-10-20 Active > draft-yeung-netmod-ospf-02 2014-10-14 Active > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01 2014-10-13 Active > draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo-01 2014-10-10 Active > draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-01 2014-10-10 Active > draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02 2014-10-08 Active > draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02 2014-10-07 Active > draft-zhdankin-netmod-bgp-cfg-01 2014-10-02 Active > draft-wang-i2rs-ospf-dm-00 2014-09-26 Active > draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking-01 2014-09-25 Active > draft-zhang-mpls-tp-yang-oam-00 2014-09-25 Active > draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04 2014-09-24 Active > draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg-08 2014-09-18 In IESG > processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue> > draft-frank-netconf-conformance-00 2014-09-16 Active > draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-00 2014-09-12 Active > draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00 2014-09-11 Active > draft-schoenw-lmap-yang-01 2014-09-02 Active > draft-zhuang-l2vpn-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-24 Active > draft-zhuang-l2vpn-evpn-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-16 Active > draft-chen-mpls-ldp-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-15 Active > draft-chen-mpls-te-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-15 Active > draft-zhuang-l3vpn-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-15 Active > draft-scharf-alto-yang-00 2014-07-04 Active > draft-yang-netmod-location-00 2014-07-04 Active > draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 2014-07-04 Active > draft-mekking-dnsop-kasp-00 2014-07-04 Active > draft-xjz-opsawg-nfvmodel-00 2014-07-04 Active > draft-liu-netmod-yang-abstract-topo-00 2014-07-03 Active > draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-01 2014-07-03 Active > draft-zheng-netmod-integrate-operations-00 2014-07-02 Active > draft-liu-netconf-multi-instances-00 2014-07-02 Active > draft-litkowski-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01 2014-06-27 Active > draft-litkowski-netmod-isis-cfg-00 2014-06-17 Active > draft-lonvick-private-tax-08 2014-06-09 Active > draft-tp-i2rs-yang-00 2014-05-08 Active > > That could be a lot of updates... > I believe we should focus on the YANG models that don't have an existing WG. > I would prefer to spend all the meeting time trying to discuss open issues in chartered items. I don't see why the NETMOD WG needs to spend time on status reports for any unchartered work. I don't agree that NETMOD WG should be the home of SYSLOG or any other protocol specific data models. IMO all those type of drafts should try to find a home in a protocol WG with the right experts. Andy > Reminder: A good avenue for any YANG models is > http://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/tutorials/yang-session.html > > Regards, Benoit > > > > > On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: >> >> Mahesh, >> >> Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your attention >> that the routing-related modules should be taken care of in their respective >> WG. See >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094.html >> >> Regards, Benoit >> >> Tom, >> >> I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can give a >> quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired. >> >> Mahesh Jethanandani >> mjethanandani@gmail.com >> >> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will put it down >> as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel its important to >> encourage discussion during the face2face meetings so insofar as I can, I >> want to give you enough runway to discuss this in detail. >> >> --Tom >> >> >> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 (to be >> submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like to discuss the draft >> and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. I think 5 minutes would be enough >> for the latter, I could even do it together with yang-json. >> >> >> Thanks, Lada >> >> >> On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau >> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote: >> >> >> Not yet. Please propose topics. >> >> >> >> I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, specified in this >> draft: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt >> >> >> These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual interim >> >> meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at the IETF >> meeting. >> >> >> >> —Tom >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) >> <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at IETF91 ? >> >> >> Some thought about topics being split between the 1st (longer) and 2nd >> (shorter) sessions ? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> netmod mailing list >> >> netmod@ietf.org >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> netmod mailing list >> >> netmod@ietf.org >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> netmod mailing list >> >> netmod@ietf.org >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> >> -- >> >> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs >> >> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- [netmod] FW: IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dana Blair (dblair)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Lisa Huang (yihuan)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman