[netmod] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-11: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in the document. Nevertheless some non-blocking
comments:

### Section 2

In `The name of the files SHOULD be of the form` the SHOULD has no guidance
required per
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/

This also contradicts (apparently) the later sentence `then a file name that
use the YANG semantic version MUST be created`.

It is also unclear whether TWO files are to be created?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


### Abstract

s/This document presents/This document *defines*/ as it is a PS I-D.

### Section 2

Should the ASCII code for '@' be specified as well ?