Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-06

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

Regards, Benoit



On 4/8/2022 8:09 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> [ Note: existing IPR declaration: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4216 ]
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of WG Last Call:
>
> 	Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> 	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> 	"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> 	"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> 	"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
> please answer the above by responding to this email regardless
> of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response
> has been received from each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
> listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations
> under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF
> if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to
> refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related
> to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs
> listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Kent (Co-Chair)
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
> .