[netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)

"Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 03:46 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147814476572.24061.13884137633380602920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:46:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/T_3CJPlPvZflRiVxm1ogSM9vCMk>
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
Subject: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Have you considered including support for the Route Information Option
(RFC4191)? Seems like it would be useful.

* default-lifetime is defined with a range of 0..9000 in this document
but the upper limit will be raised to 65535 if and when
draft-ietf-6man-maxra is approved. Is there a mechanism by which you can
easily support this increased upper limit?

[netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-… Suresh Krishnan
Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on dr… Ladislav Lhotka