[netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-07: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 03:24 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FC3127444; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, netmod@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.53.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149671949959.3984.3647471702123309969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:24:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/TbtM0PJBJU3ZhPskRUPSKpqIo7w>
Subject: [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 03:25:00 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Substantive: -4: That seems almost a challenge :-) But seriously, I dont know if it makes sense to discuss this sort of thing in this document-- but it seems like sensitivity of content might be a consideration when "typing" models. For example, models that include security credentials or keys. (An answer of "that's not what we are talking about" would be perfectly sensible.) Editorial: -1, " A number of module types have created substantial discussion during the development of this document including those concerned with topologies." I'm not sure I understand that sentence. Is the antecedent of "those" "module types", or "discussions"? Are we talking about network topologies? The section ends with "See figure 1". But that figure seems more related to section 2. Is the reference out of place?
- [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-iet… Ben Campbell
- Re: [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft… Ben Campbell