Re: [netmod] 6991bis: address-with-prefix-length

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6A81203F2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=mDnsmex+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=OTso/EPn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KDiJPnddj_ti for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4A2120187 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3474; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1554139421; x=1555349021; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=TP7URc5YPm2TicbTu672d3c02BY4R+vpGq2A+crB8VE=; b=mDnsmex+YF+c4bxATbQ8cm+wCWhc/sHc+d44dIAXj5x4Y61pH7v2bDJv J9aJAldw1ypIQDvJPosui1s+G4gHycDTNPTYN4qNtzAqIkA6h+CHmkZqd AGj8o45U2JxUgtt5ck0EIFXUG71oQv+GEsXAipCg14HfMGDXPUJ81GoZV 0=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AlalSSREchvn4k9Y+y9+DcZ1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4w0Q3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0ETB?= =?us-ascii?q?oZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjyJ/PnRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAACJSKJc/40NJK1gAxkBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEHAQEBAQEBgVEEAQEBAQELAYE9UANodAQLJwqEBINHA4RSimGCV5c?= =?us-ascii?q?PgS6BJANUDgEBGAsJg3pGAheFLSI0CQ0BAQMBAQkBAwJtHAyFSwEBAQMBASE?= =?us-ascii?q?RDAEBLAsBDQICAQgOAggCAiYCAgIZDAsVEAIEAQ0FgyIBgV0DFQEOoUECihR?= =?us-ascii?q?xgS+CeQEBBYR9GIIMAwUFgQYkAYRdhlUXgX+BEScfgkw+gmEBAYFhFwomgkM?= =?us-ascii?q?xgiaNA5dqYAkCk14alCyLP5NOAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFNOIFWcBU7KgGCQYIKg24?= =?us-ascii?q?zhGGFP3KBKI4UAYEeAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,297,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="542116474"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 01 Apr 2019 17:23:39 +0000
Received: from xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x31HNdHm030364 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:23:39 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:23:39 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:23:39 -0500
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:23:38 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TP7URc5YPm2TicbTu672d3c02BY4R+vpGq2A+crB8VE=; b=OTso/EPnxpHzxJnE0NUtnODLvNs5LFMn9mko1uM+WTu3R1nhWWgp6w/Qt1cqmvyiQ6alIoEvpcQjEXd+xTcfNspYLOcEMbwYSaRIu2EMBFjBYSw82qexdk2E0ZEdlibOvF9b1HfIqstPPP8mM2KFfPDzgy7xaILIbwga+Tlo44k=
Received: from BN6PR1101MB2226.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.174.112.11) by BN6PR1101MB2337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.173.199.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1750.20; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:23:37 +0000
Received: from BN6PR1101MB2226.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c05:e282:840b:51a1]) by BN6PR1101MB2226.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c05:e282:840b:51a1%8]) with mapi id 15.20.1750.017; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:23:37 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "Kristian Larsson" <kristian@spritelink.net>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] 6991bis: address-with-prefix-length
Thread-Index: AQHU6JixdGMCt4a400OFM02B5CwunKYnenSA///B7wCAAA6kAA==
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:23:37 +0000
Message-ID: <A0F7987F-AA67-4A63-8FEE-3B74B5B47CF1@cisco.com>
References: <10d3413c-df96-6e7d-df82-5542bb02348d@spritelink.net> <20190401161321.seiodlfsmjjvjcp5@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <F1537180-6BF3-40C7-BCFA-3AAE0290AE9D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1537180-6BF3-40C7-BCFA-3AAE0290AE9D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.82]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7c092fc5-10bf-44e6-77fd-08d6b6c6c6b7
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN6PR1101MB2337;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR1101MB2337:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR1101MB23373DE4CAE092F44FE6DA85C2550@BN6PR1101MB2337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0994F5E0C5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(54094003)(199004)(189003)(26005)(102836004)(82746002)(6506007)(6116002)(36756003)(99286004)(68736007)(2906002)(478600001)(305945005)(256004)(7736002)(14454004)(71200400001)(83716004)(97736004)(5660300002)(8936002)(81156014)(81166006)(106356001)(105586002)(8676002)(3846002)(53546011)(76176011)(316002)(966005)(53936002)(6512007)(4326008)(110136005)(25786009)(71190400001)(33656002)(6436002)(6486002)(6246003)(66066001)(6306002)(476003)(2616005)(486006)(11346002)(229853002)(446003)(86362001)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR1101MB2337; H:BN6PR1101MB2226.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: FOxVmeucMvGi0+6U5utGIxULadRqOTTF7yKWYcFEKRY57xn6HWZW3ixvaB2j+mUAqZiDXycqWWXA1EVrnNpK5LwInpSEYHKfyaMOxHEHEGS2BcwrfRSzYZiln5/9ihvYp3CRV2Ho3l2aQ/s8FeRR6lBBQB6sXgQJ+FebENM5fj5OKaBxKeCHmTC4PXldi5lj6LcgAxKMDREkNQle5A0kzvr/7LkiXGrgehxcecT96mIpsNnyyGFsQ3pLJNZXKmWmiqhSLzTScpvLDZ8UF4N4Dz75bBaR8gay2jWXsHlPipkofNR5bKYQ7DnbvxxANE3k1cUhyTCximA4M44Je3mB3SXfBZEae+hRFLchi2P4IFraNid9URjwL8bLWPfeig9i70RkA9ARxTeLgpXNJ6f4J2zMiSjoYQkT3dxwYosQYhQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0649B7258EE9F343B89507B19BF88758@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7c092fc5-10bf-44e6-77fd-08d6b6c6c6b7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Apr 2019 17:23:37.1234 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR1101MB2337
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.21, xch-rcd-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/UMVcxg_8lcbVIpb0eEfxocbGHOU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] 6991bis: address-with-prefix-length
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 17:23:44 -0000

Ok, now I'm confused. I see that the ietf-inet-type model already has the types ipv4-prefix and ipv6-prefix. How are these any different??? 
Thanks,
Acee

´╗┐On 4/1/19, 12:31 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

    I believe the "address-" could be omitted from the type identifiers. At least within the routing area, "ipv4-prefix" is unambiguous. 
    Thanks,
    Acee
    
    On 4/1/19, 12:14 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder" <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
    
        This is the right time for this and I would call these
        ip-address-prefix, ipv4-address-prefix and ipv6-address
        prefix.
        
        /js
        
        On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 04:38:34PM +0200, Kristian Larsson wrote:
        > Hello,
        > 
        > seeing that 6991 is up for a refresh I wonder if this would be the time to
        > suggest the addition of a type for address-and-prefix-length, for example
        > like 192.0.2.1/24?
        > 
        > I find that it's the most natural way express the address and prefix-length
        > to configure on an interface or for some other use. We currently have an
        > ip-prefix type which allows CIDR style prefixes but since all bits to the
        > right of the mask is to be 0 it is only possible to use for describing the
        > IP prefix / network address itself - not the address of a host in that
        > network.
        > 
        > I actually wish the interface-ip modules would have used a combined leaf for
        > these settings rather than the dual-leaf approach it currently has, but I
        > suppose that ship has sailed :/
        > 
        > Regardless, can we add such a type? Is this the document and time to do it?
        > :)
        > 
        > Kind regard,
        >    Kristian.
        > 
        > _______________________________________________
        > netmod mailing list
        > netmod@ietf.org
        > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
        
        -- 
        Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
        Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
        Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
        
        _______________________________________________
        netmod mailing list
        netmod@ietf.org
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod