IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] Question on YANG 'fraction-digit' statement

"Ivory, William" <william.ivory@intl.att.com> Thu, 19 December 2019 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <william.ivory@intl.att.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158212021D for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:27:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1PaTXidGC3b for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05FE120073 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 01:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049463.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xBJ9PUL7017340 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 04:27:18 -0500
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049463.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2wys3dpa4c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 04:27:17 -0500
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xBJ9RHfY025441 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 04:27:17 -0500
Received: from zlp27125.vci.att.com (zlp27125.vci.att.com [135.66.87.52]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xBJ9RDfN025404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 04:27:13 -0500
Received: from zlp27125.vci.att.com (zlp27125.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp27125.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id B4CB716A3EB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:27:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gbcdcmbx16.intl.att.com (unknown [135.76.180.52]) by zlp27125.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id 6BB6616A59A for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:27:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gbcdcmbx15.intl.att.com (135.76.180.51) by gbcdcmbx16.intl.att.com (135.76.180.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1847.3; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:27:11 +0000
Received: from gbcdcmbx15.intl.att.com ([fe80::f44d:965d:2bf3:fe97]) by gbcdcmbx15.intl.att.com ([fe80::f44d:965d:2bf3:fe97%5]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.003; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:27:11 +0000
From: "Ivory, William" <william.ivory@intl.att.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question on YANG 'fraction-digit' statement
Thread-Index: AQHVtk59E5GrI0jzfU6d9zF0EaSdUg==
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:27:11 +0000
Message-ID: <af85620369afc261221dae869f59052efcdeb290.camel@intl.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1
x-originating-ip: [135.76.168.250]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_af85620369afc261221dae869f59052efcdeb290camelintlattcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-19_01:2019-12-17,2019-12-19 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=280 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912190080
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Uf3EKfCVYJCO8CdqZ38EC871ppY>
Subject: [netmod] Question on YANG 'fraction-digit' statement
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:27:20 -0000

Hi,

I've got a question about the 'fraction-digit' statement which I'm hoping someone can clarify. I know it is used to specify the range of valid values, as shown (in part) in the table below:


     +----------------+-----------------------+----------------------+
     | fraction-digit | min                   | max                  |
     +----------------+-----------------------+----------------------+
     | 1              | -922337203685477580.8 | 922337203685477580.7 |
     | 2              | -92233720368547758.08 | 92233720368547758.07 |
     | 3              | -9223372036854775.808 | 9223372036854775.807 |



My question is whether it implicitly imposes any restriction on the number of digits that can follow the decimal point for a valid value, ie for 'fraction-digits 2', is 123.45678 valid, or only 123.45?

Thanks,

William

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email