IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Sun, 24 March 2019 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D886C1200F5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J2Zo7knhwNlV for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0941200F1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id u21so4609304lfu.2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nKV7scbFE+QiTNcSxxUtnxsqYYgusvZ0ZpKMjyydIew=; b=2A3EV32RgVDEINyK4jR8LETv+AWnoIKRgBrNaGr5dNPqWGognUJkHDmkIlOGxFFsHT +aoE45X/pqv9EyUTFCnMFPor0DpTXHTQ0DJsahVTzsUsCDNfZiBafFd9ypJLBZGAifQ5 W5KnBBpW+iFxbliOWxnXWCKo6phg8MUj1+3L9fR832YtR11toiH+omCh0zmP+WKeR+Mh C0hqhDwEYkbuIK8X2dtLtZfmMX+KaAGUb16tXxW7VJztZ/fPgrfZdXm5qN2KBPNOyRLB U3Glms38FC04mVueaA38m+TTOfh9Xa+HxtFNvK378Hworu1D9TjvaRVDh8yfdb9yB1UR rBeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nKV7scbFE+QiTNcSxxUtnxsqYYgusvZ0ZpKMjyydIew=; b=hfzUq+dowaOyTjL8xB8/mW2nhPORGXD5OOqy6oUZf4VsLhopmX28tu+J8JfPQ4uMpa I3SeUSoiDT92k0KH/Pl7yzOKenMz8xCqaFuuKMJs1RVTXYmAJN3u3Z/ynXFkQpUnE23U QU/RlU8dsyhTTpm2m1RMZfgrj7L7uIP6xMDyOHNtaAT2yW0hlVEdxIHSY9qZQY3ToAZ7 49foJCVdv06WPiClXwCLTZLExIEUimYdHbUFPLtHVDpirZtYUuJYDHlPaGzyL1LR1ahV 3AufDnGqatdjCfBSP0RKD/QRmkzp1IcA3Xz9kiN0w9AaLxdiK6TPXEmGWNwsLqXHFNr0 jFcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWmp/rHpxUO19/ms813cmWxRlM5VMtPrNNOoNhoIOmIWiZUOlnA Bi+3boDrSVGVNSiUT8+BJ1WFCq2T2qGo0VdqcaUhZg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFjldPFK3Yn5nNCSq+dog4uj6W1uKdNGP9NiesJN/e413vFmIRNYvFmKfjs2YRcKqDDpdIF4eaA7S7bJRzOrQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:53ab:: with SMTP id j11mr10294777lfh.49.1553461145992; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0100016978b80dcd-31f317a5-443b-400a-98b3-2bfc91841bdc-000000@email.amazonses.com> <491b2abc-90ee-90d0-6672-ffff796e14d9@labn.net> <E4480DFE-2051-4C7F-A092-5B31AA15DA80@bogus.com> <CABCOCHSdakF3vACfwPMi4sq60+ndDxTrOyeqTjRpTYSQrUdzoA@mail.gmail.com> <01000169b1732722-f41ea67f-9c6e-4ec4-a6f2-90e340b4d7a4-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <01000169b1732722-f41ea67f-9c6e-4ec4-a6f2-90e340b4d7a4-000000@email.amazonses.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:58:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHTcr-UYZew-3yX+xx7NOzk6V2S1YUwm7K7AhvO2_fcD5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Cc: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c79bd40584dd5bce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/V62Rl1a8vkgp2_8Uv2b1pZIU6wQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 20:59:10 -0000

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:45 PM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:

>
> Hi Andy,
>
> > Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I do not support adoption of the requirements document at all.
>
> Can you say why?   Is it a blanket statement about adopting requirements
> drafts in general, or something specific to this draft.
>
>
Because they just waste time.
They are mostly reverse engineered from the desired solution (by the
authors).
We end up having the same debates twice.

It is usually worse then that, since you end up debating the wording in the
requirements
instead of the merits of the solution-in-progress (considering all factors
and readjusted requirements).



> Kent
>
>
Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email