Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

David Ball <daviball@cisco.com> Thu, 17 March 2016 09:40 UTC

Return-Path: <daviball@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB90412D7D6; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbkvyQa1Blhb; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE7E12D5AA; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7755; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458207625; x=1459417225; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=UhACxixpk0f+5/Ivgs652WPGeXdQGOgeNeA8hNvEWaQ=; b=XAP5vErLAw7nfIOYL5TTpdM1xSf9leHlDieu2KC2vH0CbLozw0xf5jvD hu4E+UxhZkBdIMK7w0LFqJzz4CTX+6MGYkw6fMcqyeiG9WOrfOLKNIPma 1+tP5ZHTp1x95vdqkv6Vk/axriJNJyOP1EpMBLKA/cCmnrNrwAKfSExuQ Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,349,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217";a="676080099"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2016 09:40:23 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.68] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-68.cisco.com [10.63.23.68]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2H9eNvr019056; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:40:23 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "rwilton@cisco.com" <rwilton@cisco.com>, Selvakumar Sivaraj <ssivaraj@juniper.net>
References: <1C382F23-CC30-42CC-BF4D-BB6D3BF0DE51@juniper.net>
From: David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56EA7B87.6020702@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:40:23 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1C382F23-CC30-42CC-BF4D-BB6D3BF0DE51@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070107040205090105090503"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/VPgkqx2pM5NTtUV1_hGs7W0I8Yc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:44:05 -0700
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:40:28 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

     David

On 16/03/2016 18:52, Kent Watsen wrote:
> [This regards the new pre-adoption process described by 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html]
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR 
> that applies to draft identified above?  Please state either:
>
>     "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
>     "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?  If yes to the 
> above, please state either:
>
>     "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
>     "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer 
> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you 
> are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the 
> next stage until a response has been received from each author and 
> listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS 
> MESSAGE’S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
> listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations 
> under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if 
> you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain 
> from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your 
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed 
> above and 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
> response.
>

-- 
David Ball
<daviball@cisco.com>