IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Tue, 05 September 2017 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396461326DF; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 01:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2s0O30Jgb1nR; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 01:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BB4132396; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 01:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.41]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBAE21AE02C9; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:01:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:59:49 +0200
Message-Id: <20170905.095949.1829098658779783521.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: bclaise@cisco.com
Cc: kwatsen@juniper.net, netmod@ietf.org, netconf-chairs@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <3620aafe-bc72-cc54-9dbd-b687a0178df2@cisco.com>
References: <14299503-509D-43BE-A938-0B7B88C3B249@juniper.net> <3620aafe-bc72-cc54-9dbd-b687a0178df2@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/VefPErNIf6ijWRgtEuhWANe0SXo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:01:31 -0000

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> Kent,
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing
> > RFCs to align them with NMDA.  The first batch have been published as
> > individual drafts:
> >
> > 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
> > 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00
> > 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00
> Good. And there is one more in for NETMOD, as discussed in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessa-nmda-qa:
> RFC 7317
> In NETCONF, we have also:
>     RFC 6022, no I-D submitted yet

I don't think this one requires an update at this time.  *If* it is
changed, it might be worthwhile to remove definitions already covered
by yang-library, and probably align with the netconf server model.

>     RFC 7895, already adopted
>     RFC 8040, no I-D submitted yet. No immediate plan to update?

We have draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf-00 which "Updates: 8040".


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email