IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] Alternative approach to draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-00

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Wed, 23 March 2022 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D1F3A0B58 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5KxOKrqUSi8Z for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1132.google.com (mail-yw1-x1132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A133A0B2F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1132.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2e612af95e3so30102377b3.9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cPWjB4sriIoNgAazrqRVTb6AOwZQZ2Q7zXtci+8HpZ0=; b=as361X5jmwoyQixxPtWbrUoNYinIbE1SvaZKNkbX1GVU98S9I0rwFyYsoK1eExEZOW LUHNgAJMRL1xwE0lyA71JZzZy8tn9xnLaql9kD9I75B9QzALn0R0hNQwlsBtOQflGCly bOmtlQRe34RnDQAR0GnC5Fhd8cHTQDb5FREzlPQPlCh1/8C2kmcVojj5jU6SxNOTteTX 8H4XYviMH8ozjNcY5icGEKTl15r85vTUlKYzYXyhpoNzgSUhqiXlsdEfBnhypdTBML1S pmFmf3vMJtb8h8fRDYTrIz6stzUGvmCgF/RjdO3UDedHSeoYta8EpYXm+pLx/VWbq7zf jrbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cPWjB4sriIoNgAazrqRVTb6AOwZQZ2Q7zXtci+8HpZ0=; b=oNuKndUak78cPakA1B7bd86HG/KyMM3QyboCRm/quituF1NR2B0sxVc3X7jhhldjZl oenE5BoF/tHmFW9ut3EODY2OK3tD9kp2UHYp9V46zghWWAY9lT+yIOjw+5XsWVOL4YrO GRSrVx2rT1c4jNPgEDb3y1IQcKE8kQ+uCoM3wd0G22A+TZze967z5UPU2ywi93LKih7J ZJr9DXduud7Y/BhCl2ZVhhTFY8/0chJgGm/hzensPweC1PqWBSw7oOEIOvq5ptFN5tYq 2Zb8MyT5hWW9McFfXC/pIZQAVY/UHvJ7RAWQtVbxIUkbZXVLFjD4jETx9FDnQOBB+gM3 7gog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BDuZTQ+T4zAjEm+7an7YZpa6+rWGGIniDOSB5vICHEMAiCDQn oxEb+LH/eOU8nbYRwceHfCVJbqGI0GxpqOwCc8LeWJLQB6ulCg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxh1uqhIF/u3eilQkumnZ4AiGXf4H51zy/jTr3LxI0hgnjn6kOfvyrLAyDuz8V93185B7knZHzXcWjYWEg5ccU=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:5dd6:0:b0:2d6:3041:12e0 with SMTP id r205-20020a815dd6000000b002d6304112e0mr1748533ywb.331.1648066200398; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 13:09:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHRqZgCfH0j5XnEt0aK0fwVCaxe_aSHCAZn3jb0QLrDuKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007100c705dae850e6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/VgWib8iFInsQWXAT8E7w5cMvUug>
Subject: [netmod] Alternative approach to draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:10:07 -0000

Hi,

IMO the problem should be viewed as a refinement to the
access control policy of the device.  A standard mechanism
such as a YANG extension would be better than a growing
mix of proprietary solutions.

We have such a YANG extension called "user-write" that is widely deployed.
A simple boolean is not fine enough granularity, so a bits type is
needed instead to allow control of create, update, and delete access
operations.


https://www.yumaworks.com/pub/latest/yangauto/yumapro-yangauto-guide.html#ncx-user-write


Andy

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email