IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2966A120043 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErPhZLzxCTAk for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F05B120394 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0842DE813274E794231B; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:37:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:37:14 +0000
Received: from lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) by lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:37:14 +0000
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:37:14 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.81]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:37:09 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
CC: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
Thread-Index: AdTjt49+/Dg5AILGT8i5Hz+oFOy1ew==
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:37:08 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA48802B6@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.220.68.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA48802B6nkgeml513mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/VtkPNuDOtwc4I6jMaXMbV98IRpA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:37:25 -0000

发件人: Kent Watsen [mailto:kent@watsen.net]
发送时间: 2019年3月26日 15:37
收件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
抄送: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>; netmod@ietf.org; Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>; Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02


I would rather see <copy-config> fixed more generically to allow copying between two configuration datastores than specifically augmenting specifically for this datastore.  Hence, I think that extending/replacing the <copy-config> RPC could probably be deferred to a NETCONF-bis or NETCONF-NMDA-bis document.

Agreed.  Qin, please add to the NETCONF-next issue tracker.

https://github.com/netconf-wg/netconf-next/issues<https://github.com/netconf-wg/netconf-next/issues/>

[Qin]: Done.
Kent

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status