Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Wed, 18 October 2017 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E1E1321CB; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 05:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JS7LLd_Lhfvr; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 05:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56721320C9; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1092; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508330138; x=1509539738; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=z2JrWXcmZxbwG8EjCt/fYxYQDLxcCrl2s9mYEAww5uo=; b=baSq3wf8sMFl1hTBf830Bin0gkzT0co6EkbNE1MMR7g81W+7wvEn/NLg PVv48+q2r8k7wc2XIu20YDiqrhvMUGftJP378UmfFK8W3w13CWTiM06Fp b8A+sfB0DrpAiW9nXJQ+JoNZruqfbNXFxJvbPemx+iqyKdDjkEJmcteYP 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CjAADTSedZ/49dJa1ZAxkBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYNfZG4ujhKPOIF4ljOCFAofhRwChHk/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohR0?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEDATo/BQkCAgEIDgIFAx4QGxclAgQODROJfQisbos5AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBHQWDKoIHgVGFF4UmJoUtBaFLApRhkyGVRgIRGQGBOAEfOIFbehW?= =?us-ascii?q?DLgiEVokbLIEFgREBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,396,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="18130131"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2017 12:35:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9ICZb0K019549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:35:37 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:35:36 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:35:36 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
CC: "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis@ietf.org>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
Thread-Index: AQHTK/QAeOXxoJMMEUGe5/uottVNQaLoNIuAgADU1oD//56TYIAAL14wgADGxQCAAB2HcA==
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:35:36 +0000
Message-ID: <d79e33af5ec5409aafe3dcbc3184c37f@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <DE7DEC2E-F737-4020-8830-AF556A65EEF5@juniper.net> <001701d3470b$8f473fe0$add5bfa0$@clemm.org> <EA300017-CDE0-4006-95D5-D2E81CBBE9E3@juniper.net> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EAB6C8C@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <4862029103bb46d7b56013331d9e2d3c@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <20171018062228.dx7etbayhuslswkx@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20171018062228.dx7etbayhuslswkx@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Vy8dPcxr08m7MSYY1sJsz2214VI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:35:41 -0000

> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM
> 
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> >
> > Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools which
> are run on upload of an Internet draft.   Errors and warnings found later (and
> perhaps through tools a user doesn't have) should not result in a module being
> given an error designation.
> >
> 
> I disagree. An error is an error regardless when or how it was detected.

What I am trying to avoid is YANG errors being discovered via validation tools for which the model author has no access to before a submitted draft is accepted.   However this can be accomplished is fine with me.

One solution is to ensure the RFC upload process has access to all tools currently used for model validation.  

Eric

> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>