Re: [netmod] schema-mount pre09 branch

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AA81243F3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 02:14:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ijz-WB_OKRUg for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 02:14:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D06120727 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 02:14:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.45]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5936E1AE0118; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:14:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:14:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <20180207.111441.1066018064701748797.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, kwatsen@juniper.net, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180207094845.ift6vhoomsp4d7kk@elstar.local>
References: <20180206141655.6iast3lbhubk6rk5@elstar.local> <3f3f9984-0797-1ded-ded4-17543382f628@cisco.com> <20180207094845.ift6vhoomsp4d7kk@elstar.local>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/VzT0MGvZa-Vyv_WHMLoIqivDapM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] schema-mount pre09 branch
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 10:14:50 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:25:52PM +0000, Robert Wilton wrote:
> > 
> > I think that the term "external" could also be confusing, since I think that
> > sort of implies peer mount like semantics.
> 
> The "inline" mount concept seems to subsume peer mounts. From the
> model perspective, is there a difference whether the mounted data is
> local or remote (and what does local/remove mean for a VM)?
>  
> > I would suggest the term "dynamic" instead of "inline " but that could
> > easily be confused with dynamic datastores.
> 
> Yes, I think this is not a good word either.
> 
> > Perhaps rather than "inline" another choice could be "discoverable", i.e.
> > the schema is not known, and is dynamically discoverable inline at the mount
> > point.
> > Equally, rather than "use-schema", perhaps a better choice would be "known",
> > i.e. the schema is already known, and made available as part of YANG
> > library.
> 
> Perhaps integrated schema vs. mounted schema.

I like the term "integrated" better than "use-schema".  But both cases
are mounted, so we need another term than "mounted" for "inline".
"segregated" doesn't sound quite right ;-)


/martin

> 
> > Whether it would be right to change these at this time, I've no idea ...
> 
> Yep.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>