Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements
Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 06 November 2017 17:30 UTC
Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFEB13FBAB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:30:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFxID1sgguxc for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:30:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEEF13FBA8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:30:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1616; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1509989419; x=1511199019; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6jJOV0C08dmJq7Wgdi47yXWSZKPnibS7Ur0y4dOMX60=; b=V5Fi/pXoh5oIZelF53sthT56vvUAoiH8YR+5XypmnQ1ROvnnFPTevF9C LCO2tKjpCupntBw0J5u74ShC7ST2wd7OXoF41+JP147iYerVDZGwccxA2 UqK2zG0Oe6RmXN0f+M5Xv5NDqguYyXHxedFyfRlsg1Xaa3KdjrWfmZAAE E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CQAgAYmwBa/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhBhuJ4N9ixOPfyaWVoIBChgLhElPAoUqFQEBAQEBAQEBAWsohR4BAQEDAQEBIQ8BBTYQCwsOCgICJgICJzAGAQwGAgEBihcIEKsIgieLDAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEaBYEPgh+DWoISC4J2hHqDLIJiBaIOlHyLeIc8jimHbYE5NSKBbDQhCB0VSYJkhF9BNot2AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,353,1505779200"; d="scan'208";a="57526"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2017 17:30:17 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.76] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-76.cisco.com [10.63.23.76]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vA6HUHh4018901; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:30:17 GMT
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20171106.141924.996087392255055625.mbj@tail-f.com> <15f9188b728.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <20171106.154913.1683303692062360930.mbj@tail-f.com> <15f91db9dd0.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <5c1d29df-4cdf-4972-5a11-0a111177bf93@cisco.com> <15f92077478.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <f4cf2723-af37-c0ba-be28-ccb635ee9b4a@cisco.com> <a6eac745-0784-daa2-103a-1c4b28990f51@labn.net> <20171106170247.l4tmjglageyakqgx@elstar.local> <4dbcf0d6-a11a-e410-a958-32058914da53@labn.net> <20171106171707.hd535oyhpysnxtec@elstar.local> <dfb9c835-7f11-4d97-e5b8-0d81c926a366@labn.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <c3a41310-8389-bb1c-3db9-f701200b7069@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:30:17 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dfb9c835-7f11-4d97-e5b8-0d81c926a366@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/WO4dHD-XjF-p_834uMwsBUhtN9o>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 17:30:21 -0000
On 06/11/2017 17:24, Lou Berger wrote: > > On 11/6/2017 12:17 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >> What is default content of a list? Where is this coming from? > Whatever the vendor chooses in their code, and perhaps what gets defined > in future model definitions... This is mixing up config and state: The device's default module tags wouldn't be in <running>, only in <operational>, [ and perhaps <intended>.] Only the clients configured modification to the module tags ends up in <running>. This is merged with the system module tags, and then the resultant set end up in <operational>. Resetting the list to default is achieved by just deleting the list entry in <running>. No special RPC is needed. Thanks, Rob > Lou > >> /js >> >> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote: >>> What's the standard way to reset a list to a default (based on >>> implementation)? >>> >>> On 11/6/2017 12:02 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:48:23AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote: >>>>> The tags draft has an RPC to 'reset to default state'. I could see >>>>> wanting the reset to be persistent or not depending on actual usage... >>>>> >>>> In general, I think we love the usage of standard operations like >>>> edit-config to manipulate configuration datastores and I think we >>>> dislike custom operations that manipulate configuration datastores. >>>> >>>> /js >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > . >
- [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Martin Bjorklund
- [netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: augme… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK? Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: a… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: a… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: a… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [netmod] Reset tags RPC [was Re: Action and RPC s… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements t.petch