Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 11:22 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8479C132355 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 04:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PkBzPf5ykLEy for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 04:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9B91252BA for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 04:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.41]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6569D1AE0352; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:22:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:20:31 +0200
Message-Id: <20170913.132031.1474514593050589478.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: lberger@labn.net
Cc: lhotka@nic.cz, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <f546e06b-c89f-084b-7374-b7a8cb58bc57@labn.net>
References: <20170830.094028.1809893324608957744.mbj@tail-f.com> <15e32791e40.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <f546e06b-c89f-084b-7374-b7a8cb58bc57@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/WQ-IScNNXPx-ktEOAhMCTG2nd_4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:22:07 -0000
Hi, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: > Hi, > > The LNI/NI authors/RTG Area DT met yesterday and discussed the proposed > change as well as the other topics that came up in the subsequent > discussion. The high order bit is that the proposed and current > definitions are adequate for our needs. Read further if you care about > details, including confirming our understanding: > > 1) WRT xpath context change proposed by martin > > Our understanding is that absolute paths continue to be allowed Yes, this is correct. > , for > example the following remains valid: > > "use-schema": [ > { > "name": "ni-schema", > "parent-reference": [ > "/*[namespace-uri() = 'urn:ietf:...:ietf-interfaces']" > ] > } > ] > > Assuming yes, then we have no objection to the change (as it allows the > server implementor to choose how/if they support vrf name filtering. > Obviously, using the new syntax exposes the restriction to the client > which is probably desirable.) > > 2. parent-reference location is adequate for our needs. > This said, we think parent-references are more appropriately contained > within the schema list and having them there will yield less complex > operational data. > > 3. current mount point extension usage definition (must be in a list or > container). > Our use case is covered by always having a single mount point contained > in a container. We don't see the need for mount point extensions within > lists or for there to ever be siblings of mount point extensions. > > We don't see a need to discuss items 2 and 3 further at this time. > Assuming our understanding is correct, we will update the NI and LNE > draft as soon as schema mount is updated as proposed. Ok, since we haven't seen any objections to the proposal, I will update the schema mount draft accordingly. /martin > > Lou > (as contributor and NI/LNE draft co-author) > > > On 8/30/2017 5:29 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > > FYI I've asked folks in the routing area, i.e., the ietf users of schema > > mount, if they have an opinion on the node discussion. I will also do so on > > the point I raised on parent reference location. (Which is independent from > > your format change.) Clearly, if I'm the only one to be raising objections, > > I'll be the one in the rough on these points. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Lou > > - as contributor > > > > > > On August 30, 2017 3:42:26 AM Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote: > > > >> Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote: > >>> Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> writes: > >>> > >>>> Lada, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >>>>> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: > >> [...] > >> > >>>>>> PS is your view aligned with martin or our example? > >>>>> If you mean shifting the XPath context node to the mount point instance, > >>> then > >>>>> yes. > >> So, going back to the original issue; does anyone have any objection > >> to changing the XPath context for parent-reference as describied in my > >> original post? > >> > >> > >> /martin > >> >
- [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Per Hedeland
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Per Hedeland
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Xufeng Liu
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1 terminolo… t.petch