[netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 September 2019 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDABE120864; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, netmod@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <156769446677.22608.7381486936621146842.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 07:41:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/WZ651jVxDiEAXIQFB_pJKMkWjjg>
Subject: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:41:07 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

After some thought I think there are two things about this document that make
me uncomfortable enough to ballot Discuss.

a) Due to its home in the netmod WG it is highly likely that people outside the
yang community have not paid enough attention to this work. Since this is
applicable to code fragments of all kinds, I think the home chosen for this RFC
might have inadvertently limited input from the broader community.

b) Given a) I think it is better that this document go forward as an
Informational document rather than a BCP so that use of this technique becomes
optional, without the force of a BCP behind it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do agree with my Abstaining colleagues that this should probably not be on
the IETF stream but I think the work is useful enough to go forward.