Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995CD1389A0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p5FVS7IRUTEH for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E8F7138F9C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b190so20321585lfg.9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vQOy/Xe/mbrnDHzBaCOaxe2OzdUNQIxvbJ5VA5CQccI=; b=0d1eyj7NuScHwc6gciBxIyqHQqgeXMRu+Z48rlS/udIfDZmEqEDtNJsEgRACaFbDyY WsqTUnpriwKhE1lSCDC94BJwK29DSqXzyLJ3NH2ZgIkbLBJddRV4bn9gjjBnMMNLqMhG 0OB55ZL65NQFchrF2wi4d/rji26+YPjcwiE02brQrNbALcrpvUwPzSre+KD7zg0dbeCl PBuJ5wIULGRzlDZGr6cjFcc2ljND/aWYqe0odsjHF5w0kAUhJhu0t2I1KZAmFbBDQsj/ zIVT6WReoQ32qbszxWsXvyZgea/594kOkqNKGmTPztIibeLxYDVdJMol3Z04N3Ey6Te2 KkZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vQOy/Xe/mbrnDHzBaCOaxe2OzdUNQIxvbJ5VA5CQccI=; b=CHkelObMSDBkOEf2MbxVtI3ojbw1+dkUP55gqc4Cg/MULnJ0sGOtd9wDBxeecR7fOB dfSWs68dSLp9E0Fim0/+bWcX3fPWm4oUzn2rBIHOrPigndYP5R+cfqG/Rym3t2YFi2vs 4Ora1aSuEF4UmtbI5DrgqLsLgACIrio0eQX9cXOdz2QEizsCJQ9Tv2eBYx5HStpY1z0r RucxgtcNQl9IprS0abbjtSldWiDwKFjgBlRBY+/ZQ0BCC2forjq9IwdWhvu5TPCWdggO rjkiJeI1BKUbmumHLfxhJB7r1vnzHXdGf5JmG0NkEkEWRsQec/tLN6A7zLlL699RX/2c gUHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXU9aeBqVXrRj3IgopjvXcNktuWUnKZXz14tJui7VaAzeBegHIS 7eRxSaHEkD8f7nSvLh3z1VBRyXFXAhoyG4totNXdlQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TQvMaEdK+vRWqKvPsr9LUqN1rKZn3sOvHpANdkAgpnCNetQ95fIy1m3hb5ZCz0850ObirrjaPr/I/YkZW/VYo=
X-Received: by 10.25.22.194 with SMTP id 63mr4436300lfw.205.1508768794447; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.150.198 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20171023.103513.1336510497564838401.mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <20171016190431.5FA26B80E0F@rfc-editor.org> <67172aec-686f-90ba-0fc8-1ce2bc3dcdb4@cisco.com> <20171023.103513.1336510497564838401.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:26:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHRqG9DNJf9q0xG1x+Rjy3oAAOoh1EawcCLQwwy=edHk3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Berger Lou <lberger@labn.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f20920aa0b9055c379c75"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/WyvwVrffq0hARGq_gcOpinWlf-U>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:26:38 -0000

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

> Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Shall I validate this one?
>
> No I don't think this is correct.  We choose a quoted string to be
> able to correctly represent all YANG integer and decimal64 values.
> Note that XPath doesn't have integers, just 64-bit floats.  This means
> that not all 64-bit integers can be expressed as numbers in XPath.
>
>
It's OK to leave this out since it requires a code change.


Read sec. 2.3 again:

The node test text() is true for any text node.




>
> /martin
>
>

Andy


>
> >
> > Regards, Benoit
> > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
> > > "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > You may review the report below and at:
> > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5157
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Type: Technical
> > > Reported by: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
> > >
> > > Section: 14
> > >
> > > Original Text
> > > -------------
> > >    key-predicate-expr  = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP quoted-string
> > >
> > > Corrected Text
> > > --------------
> > >    key-predicate-expr  = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP
> > >          (quoted-string / integer-value / decimal-value)
> > >
> > > Notes
> > > -----
> > > An instance identifier is forced to specify every key value to be a
> > > string
> > > even though the YANG key leaf type could be a numeric type.
> > > XPath does not require a quoted string here, just YANG.
> > >
> > > Old:  /top/list[idx="4"]
> > > New: /top/list[idx=4]
> > >
> > > Instructions:
> > > -------------
> > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Title               : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
> > > Publication Date    : August 2016
> > > Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
> > > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > > Source              : NETCONF Data Modeling Language
> > > Area                : Operations and Management
> > > Stream              : IETF
> > > Verifying Party     : IESG
> > > .
> > >
> >
>