Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F4C1A019B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:30:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFNU8UyCfqfp for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D441A0196 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:29:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=38152; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415140196; x=1416349796; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=H3PKHN0PUZfuJbshIC02vi+pj5NeVqzZarJcu3vkpHk=; b=dy0FVFgzQ4EXMps/C5KSkHFEdloOzZZ4s8o+RmzEKhhbCt9zs9qXmKUq WkW5NMxAJk3FalbNL5sS5GiAGdz5J96uLh1vgB0LYTJu6R4Hd0lHsIGsc bCOYjDjuWi4LJlLPsMDLRbccmFbOQWoJ1Pjgjfe5/XVAoydn9gIYV3v3p g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMEALtSWVStJssW/2dsb2JhbABbAYNhWc5eAQuGd1QCgTYBAQEBAX2EAwEBBAEBASBLCgEQCQIOCgkWAQEGAwICCQMCAQIBDwYfEQYBDAEFAgEBBYgjAxINklWcX45cDYYtAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF45WgVcSAQFPBgGCd4FUBYRqlAKCTUOCEoExg0yCd4csQoJnhAmDeTwvAYEOgTwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,315,1413244800"; d="scan'208,217";a="235106932"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2014 22:29:53 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA4MTrkM032084; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 22:29:53 GMT
Message-ID: <54595361.5000907@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:29:53 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com> <54590195.3010903@cisco.com> <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010700010202010104000309"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/XG5WkMprL7tQAAZrt_NAKVg4Kes
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:30:01 -0000

Mahesh,
> Benoit,
>
> I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is 
> being presented/discussed in its own WG.
I wonder which ideal outcome you want a presentation in the NETMOD WG?

Here's the list of drafts that have normative or unclassified references 
to YANG:

    draft-vanderstok-core-comi-05 2014-10-27  Active
    draft-shi-alto-yang-json-00                       2014-10-27 Active
    draft-shi-alto-yang-model-00                      2014-10-27 Active
    draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00              2014-10-27 Active
    draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05               2014-10-27 Active
    draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-active-active-cfg-00        2014-10-27 Active
    draft-zaalouk-supa-configuration-model-01         2014-10-27 Active
    draft-wang-lime-rpc-yang-oam-management-00        2014-10-27 Active
    draft-vergara-flexigrid-yang-00                   2014-10-27 Active
    draft-gandhi-mpls-te-yang-model-01                2014-10-27 Active
    draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-01             2014-10-27 Active
    draft-zheng-netmod-xmi-yang-translation-00        2014-10-27 Active
    draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-info-model-00            2014-10-27 Active
    draft-tripathy-cloud-sla-yang-model-00            2014-10-27 Active
    draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-l3-topo-00                  2014-10-27 Active
    draft-contreras-supa-yang-network-topo-01         2014-10-27 Active
    draft-wang-yang-bfd-oam-00                        2014-10-27 Active
    draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04                2014-10-26 Active
    draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01                  2014-10-26 Active
    draft-shen-l2tpext-l2tpv3-yang-model-00           2014-10-26 Active
    draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16                  2014-10-26 Active
    draft-shaikh-idr-bgp-model-00                     2014-10-26 Active
    draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-03                    2014-10-25 Active
    draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-01                        2014-10-25 Active
    draft-sarikaya-dmm-for-wifi-01                    2014-10-24 Active
    draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-01      2014-10-24 Active
    draft-shi-model-json-msg-yang-00                  2014-10-24 Active
    draft-liu-pim-igmp-mld-yang-00                    2014-10-23 Active
    draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-01                   2014-10-23 Active
    draft-liu-pim-yang-00                             2014-10-23 Active
    draft-asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model-00           2014-10-22 Active
    draft-dong-i2rs-l2-network-topology-00            2014-10-21 Active
    draft-bierman-netconf-efficiency-extensions-02    2014-10-21 Active
    draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-cfg-00                      2014-10-21 Active
    draft-sun-softwire-yang-00                        2014-10-20 Active
    draft-yeung-netmod-ospf-02                        2014-10-14 Active
    draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01                    2014-10-13 Active
    draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo-01             2014-10-10 Active
    draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-01                   2014-10-10 Active
    draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02              2014-10-08 Active
    draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02                       2014-10-07 Active
    draft-zhdankin-netmod-bgp-cfg-01                  2014-10-02 Active
    draft-wang-i2rs-ospf-dm-00                        2014-09-26 Active
    draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking-01   2014-09-25 Active
    draft-zhang-mpls-tp-yang-oam-00                   2014-09-25 Active
    draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04          2014-09-24 Active
    draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg-08                     2014-09-18  In
    IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
    draft-frank-netconf-conformance-00                2014-09-16 Active
    draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-00    2014-09-12 Active
    draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00              2014-09-11 Active
    draft-schoenw-lmap-yang-01                        2014-09-02 Active
    draft-zhuang-l2vpn-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-24 Active
    draft-zhuang-l2vpn-evpn-yang-cfg-00               2014-08-16 Active
    draft-chen-mpls-ldp-yang-cfg-00                   2014-08-15 Active
    draft-chen-mpls-te-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-15 Active
    draft-zhuang-l3vpn-yang-cfg-00                    2014-08-15 Active
    draft-scharf-alto-yang-00                         2014-07-04 Active
    draft-yang-netmod-location-00                     2014-07-04 Active
    draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05                    2014-07-04 Active
    draft-mekking-dnsop-kasp-00                       2014-07-04 Active
    draft-xjz-opsawg-nfvmodel-00                      2014-07-04 Active
    draft-liu-netmod-yang-abstract-topo-00            2014-07-03 Active
    draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-01                  2014-07-03 Active
    draft-zheng-netmod-integrate-operations-00        2014-07-02 Active
    draft-liu-netconf-multi-instances-00              2014-07-02 Active
    draft-litkowski-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01             2014-06-27 Active
    draft-litkowski-netmod-isis-cfg-00                2014-06-17 Active
    draft-lonvick-private-tax-08                      2014-06-09 Active
    draft-tp-i2rs-yang-00                             2014-05-08 Active

That could be a lot of updates...
I believe we should focus on the YANG models that don't have an existing WG.

Reminder: A good avenue for any YANG models is 
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/tutorials/yang-session.html

Regards, Benoit
>
>
>
> On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com 
> <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     Mahesh,
>
>     Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your
>     attention that the routing-related modules should be taken care of
>     in their respective WG. See
>     http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094.html
>
>     Regards, Benoit
>>     Tom,
>>
>>     I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can
>>     give a quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired.
>>
>>     *Mahesh Jethanandani*
>>     mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
>>
>>     On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau"
>>     <tnadeau@lucidvision.com <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>        We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will
>>>     put it down as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel
>>>     its important to encourage discussion during the face2face
>>>     meetings so insofar as I can, I want to give you enough runway
>>>     to discuss this in detail.
>>>
>>>        --Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>>     On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka
>>>>     <lhotka@nic.cz <mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi,
>>>>
>>>>     apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16
>>>>     (to be submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like
>>>>     to discuss the draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00.
>>>>     I think 5 minutes would be enough for the latter, I could even
>>>>     do it together with yang-json.
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks, Lada
>>>>
>>>>     On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com
>>>>     <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau
>>>>>     <tnadeau@lucidvision.com <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>        Not yet. Please propose topics.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues,
>>>>>     specified in this draft:
>>>>>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt
>>>>>
>>>>>     These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual
>>>>>     interim
>>>>>     meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at
>>>>>     the IETF meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>        —Tom
>>>>>
>>>>>     Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>     On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason)
>>>>>>     <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com
>>>>>>     <mailto:jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at
>>>>>>     IETF91 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Some thought about topics being split between the 1st
>>>>>>     (longer) and 2nd (shorter) sessions ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>>>     Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>     netmod mailing list
>>>>>>     netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>>>>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     netmod mailing list
>>>>>     netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>>>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     netmod mailing list
>>>>>     netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>>>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>>
>>>>     --
>>>>     Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>>>>     PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     netmod mailing list
>>>     netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     netmod mailing list
>>     netmod@ietf.org  <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>