Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 22:30 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F4C1A019B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:30:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFNU8UyCfqfp for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D441A0196 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:29:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=38152; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415140196; x=1416349796; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=H3PKHN0PUZfuJbshIC02vi+pj5NeVqzZarJcu3vkpHk=; b=dy0FVFgzQ4EXMps/C5KSkHFEdloOzZZ4s8o+RmzEKhhbCt9zs9qXmKUq WkW5NMxAJk3FalbNL5sS5GiAGdz5J96uLh1vgB0LYTJu6R4Hd0lHsIGsc bCOYjDjuWi4LJlLPsMDLRbccmFbOQWoJ1Pjgjfe5/XVAoydn9gIYV3v3p g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMEALtSWVStJssW/2dsb2JhbABbAYNhWc5eAQuGd1QCgTYBAQEBAX2EAwEBBAEBASBLCgEQCQIOCgkWAQEGAwICCQMCAQIBDwYfEQYBDAEFAgEBBYgjAxINklWcX45cDYYtAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF45WgVcSAQFPBgGCd4FUBYRqlAKCTUOCEoExg0yCd4csQoJnhAmDeTwvAYEOgTwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,315,1413244800"; d="scan'208,217";a="235106932"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2014 22:29:53 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA4MTrkM032084; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 22:29:53 GMT
Message-ID: <54595361.5000907@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:29:53 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
References: <A125E53CE190A749957C19483DC79F9F5C977E5A@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <D8D374DB-32C6-4725-AD1B-D4E1B23BC966@lucidvision.com> <CABCOCHSoDxZfzA0dnviB2yV8GbdqmUrGmJXsFxMy8_7MpG7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <79054E89-2D09-4461-8D35-8F6FA025B71F@nic.cz> <43060BE7-53EA-4B9D-B778-2FED58C0D60C@lucidvision.com> <52AE09CB-D4AB-4421-BBA4-1D9C45EA6957@gmail.com> <54590195.3010903@cisco.com> <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAchPMtcvd3xb9xCGEBHqTZg8G-Fg76z8T2Wi1QLHoS=W_fiag@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010700010202010104000309"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/XG5WkMprL7tQAAZrt_NAKVg4Kes
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:30:01 -0000
Mahesh, > Benoit, > > I was going to give a quick update on the BFD YANG model, which is > being presented/discussed in its own WG. I wonder which ideal outcome you want a presentation in the NETMOD WG? Here's the list of drafts that have normative or unclassified references to YANG: draft-vanderstok-core-comi-05 2014-10-27 Active draft-shi-alto-yang-json-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-shi-alto-yang-model-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-wildes-netmod-syslog-model-05 2014-10-27 Active draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-active-active-cfg-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-zaalouk-supa-configuration-model-01 2014-10-27 Active draft-wang-lime-rpc-yang-oam-management-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-vergara-flexigrid-yang-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-gandhi-mpls-te-yang-model-01 2014-10-27 Active draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-01 2014-10-27 Active draft-zheng-netmod-xmi-yang-translation-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-info-model-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-tripathy-cloud-sla-yang-model-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-l3-topo-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-contreras-supa-yang-network-topo-01 2014-10-27 Active draft-wang-yang-bfd-oam-00 2014-10-27 Active draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-04 2014-10-26 Active draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01 2014-10-26 Active draft-shen-l2tpext-l2tpv3-yang-model-00 2014-10-26 Active draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 2014-10-26 Active draft-shaikh-idr-bgp-model-00 2014-10-26 Active draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-03 2014-10-25 Active draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-01 2014-10-25 Active draft-sarikaya-dmm-for-wifi-01 2014-10-24 Active draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-01 2014-10-24 Active draft-shi-model-json-msg-yang-00 2014-10-24 Active draft-liu-pim-igmp-mld-yang-00 2014-10-23 Active draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-01 2014-10-23 Active draft-liu-pim-yang-00 2014-10-23 Active draft-asechoud-netmod-diffserv-model-00 2014-10-22 Active draft-dong-i2rs-l2-network-topology-00 2014-10-21 Active draft-bierman-netconf-efficiency-extensions-02 2014-10-21 Active draft-zhang-nvo3-yang-cfg-00 2014-10-21 Active draft-sun-softwire-yang-00 2014-10-20 Active draft-yeung-netmod-ospf-02 2014-10-14 Active draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01 2014-10-13 Active draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo-01 2014-10-10 Active draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-01 2014-10-10 Active draft-bogdanovic-netmod-acl-model-02 2014-10-08 Active draft-clemm-netmod-mount-02 2014-10-07 Active draft-zhdankin-netmod-bgp-cfg-01 2014-10-02 Active draft-wang-i2rs-ospf-dm-00 2014-09-26 Active draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking-01 2014-09-25 Active draft-zhang-mpls-tp-yang-oam-00 2014-09-25 Active draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04 2014-09-24 Active draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg-08 2014-09-18 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue> draft-frank-netconf-conformance-00 2014-09-16 Active draft-haas-i2rs-netmod-netconf-requirements-00 2014-09-12 Active draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00 2014-09-11 Active draft-schoenw-lmap-yang-01 2014-09-02 Active draft-zhuang-l2vpn-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-24 Active draft-zhuang-l2vpn-evpn-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-16 Active draft-chen-mpls-ldp-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-15 Active draft-chen-mpls-te-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-15 Active draft-zhuang-l3vpn-yang-cfg-00 2014-08-15 Active draft-scharf-alto-yang-00 2014-07-04 Active draft-yang-netmod-location-00 2014-07-04 Active draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 2014-07-04 Active draft-mekking-dnsop-kasp-00 2014-07-04 Active draft-xjz-opsawg-nfvmodel-00 2014-07-04 Active draft-liu-netmod-yang-abstract-topo-00 2014-07-03 Active draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-01 2014-07-03 Active draft-zheng-netmod-integrate-operations-00 2014-07-02 Active draft-liu-netconf-multi-instances-00 2014-07-02 Active draft-litkowski-isis-yang-isis-cfg-01 2014-06-27 Active draft-litkowski-netmod-isis-cfg-00 2014-06-17 Active draft-lonvick-private-tax-08 2014-06-09 Active draft-tp-i2rs-yang-00 2014-05-08 Active That could be a lot of updates... I believe we should focus on the YANG models that don't have an existing WG. Reminder: A good avenue for any YANG models is http://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/tutorials/yang-session.html Regards, Benoit > > > > On Tue Nov 04 2014 at 8:40:55 AM Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com > <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote: > > Mahesh, > > Not sure what exactly you want to present but let me draw your > attention that the routing-related modules should be taken care of > in their respective WG. See > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-yang-coord/current/msg00094.html > > Regards, Benoit >> Tom, >> >> I am giving an update on the BFD YANG model in the BFD WG. I can >> give a quick update (~1-2min) in NETMOD if such an update is desired. >> >> *Mahesh Jethanandani* >> mjethanandani@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com> >> >> On Oct 23, 2014, at 1:43 PM, "Thomas D. Nadeau" >> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> We have plenty of runway in the agenda right now so I will >>> put it down as two items. We reserved two slots because I feel >>> its important to encourage discussion during the face2face >>> meetings so insofar as I can, I want to give you enough runway >>> to discuss this in detail. >>> >>> --Tom >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 23, 2014:12:13 PM, at 12:13 PM, Ladislav Lhotka >>>> <lhotka@nic.cz <mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> apart from the two WG items draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16 >>>> (to be submitted) and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-01, I’d like >>>> to discuss the draft and draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-metadata-00. >>>> I think 5 minutes would be enough for the latter, I could even >>>> do it together with yang-json. >>>> >>>> Thanks, Lada >>>> >>>> On 23 Oct 2014, at 18:02, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com >>>> <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau >>>>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Not yet. Please propose topics. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would like 15 min. to discuss YANG conformance issues, >>>>> specified in this draft: >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-04.txt >>>>> >>>>> These issues may get resolved in the NETCONF YANG 1.1 virtual >>>>> interim >>>>> meeting next week. If not, this topic should be discussed at >>>>> the IETF meeting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> —Tom >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 21, 2014:5:32 PM, at 5:32 PM, Sterne, Jason (Jason) >>>>>> <jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com >>>>>> <mailto:jason.sterne@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a preliminary agenda for the two NETMOD sessions at >>>>>> IETF91 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Some thought about topics being split between the 1st >>>>>> (longer) and 2nd (shorter) sessions ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> netmod mailing list >>>>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs >>>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- [netmod] FW: IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dana Blair (dblair)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Lisa Huang (yihuan)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Thomas D. Nadeau
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Randy Presuhn
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Sterne, Jason (Jason)
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? t.petch
- Re: [netmod] IETF91 NETMOD agenda ? Andy Bierman