Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Editorial comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-05

"Jonathan Hansford" <> Wed, 27 June 2018 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADBF130F36; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 01:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tygbQ-FGFGle; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 01:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4BDE130F4C; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 01:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Reply-To:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=573xVB+XOuoTgtJgLKdVB7XJzbaxrcT3LUBQc2+u2Ws=; b=lt6P57fY34jiKNjUsr8yhzrvF ySn+HUUW5nn4WTFHV00rufUc4A+V7XMD60sJ+FE/Bki9uSnf0DkkIeKU1zf/czVbl92idcX51/kqX OgxYgjvFO5OQ+QdQmkCSKCpWyQXh3TKlywdtQY6bMCWLnYt/LhtYugDQcqoXSRyH9lSim9Ze0bM5p 74uKmD49wI7AZzHnXuXSiDee6DBSs0VWcVVwt09TiWe+hPcsRK2bvzp3iHs5WmcouS4pYgHjKqe1z ZWZMBNG5ghXjRKXyqJPbNv0/2WK75F+I5OnvdD9jUOCGdhn+WJJKIUwNN0KKcuLzTPlrXx/JegHLK 0MKRhOgfg==;
Received: from [] (port=50221 helo=[]) by with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <>) id 1fY6Ds-00B5N2-1B; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 09:54:44 +0100
From: "Jonathan Hansford" <>
To: "Qin Wu" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:54:47 +0000
Message-Id: <em8c3bc9ee-b8c9-4f97-aa0a-4f606d0b96e1@morpheus>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <em6d922c27-30cd-41e3-806d-25669aa83a62@morpheus> <>
Reply-To: "Jonathan Hansford" <>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.1.32088.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------=_MB9C86765A-34E9-4CDD-AF05-FFEA78D3B148"
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180627-0, 27/06/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname -
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain -
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: authenticated_id:
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Editorial comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-05
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:54:50 -0000

Re Section 4.1, 2nd paragraph, can I suggest the first sentence be 
reworded along the lines of "Fundamentally, the issue is whether the 
artwork remains readable once folded." And I would add that sentence to 
the end of the previous paragraph and start paragraph 2 afterwards.

------ Original Message ------
From: "Qin Wu" <>
To: "Jonathan Hansford" <>et>; "" 
<>rg>; "" <>
Sent: 27/06/2018 09:09:47
Subject: RE: [Netconf] Editorial comments on 

>Thanks Jonathan for comments, please see my reply inline below.
>发件人: Netconf [] 代表 Jonathan Hansford
>发送时间: 2018年6月26日 23:46
>主题: [Netconf] Editorial comments on 
>Just a few editorial comments on 
>General:Though there is a header to indicate where the artwork starts, 
>there is no footer to indicate where it ends. How would a parser know 
>when to stop?
>[Qin]: Good point, if you follows netmod discussion, Martin has similar 
>suggestion. We need to decide whether we should support fold framing or 
>extract artwork based on header and footer in this draft.
>Should the header (and footer) be deleted for any artwork that does not 
>require folding?
>[Qin]If we allow the user to specify maximum length limit for each 
>line, I think header and footer is not needed,
>         If we use header and footer to indicate where the line start 
>and where the line end, header and footer is only needed during artwork 
>extraction phase.
>Section 4.1: 1st paragraph: A very minor issue, but "e.g." and "etc." 
>should not be used in the same list. "e.g." is used for a list of 
>examples and by implication isn't complete, therefore "etc." is already 
>                           [Qin]: Okay.
>2nd paragraph: Not sure what the 1st sentence is saying.
>                       [Qin] Suppose the artwork is a table, the table 
>needs to be folded, folding result may look bad.
>2nd sentence: s/susceptible is/susceptible to3rd sentence: s/fair/fairs
>                     [Qin]: Okay, thanks.
>Section 4.2, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence: repetition of "out" - one of 
>them needs removingSection 5.2:2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: s/than 
>then/than the3rd paragraph, 1st sentence: s/be lead/lead
>                [Qin]: Okay, thanks.
>Section 5.3:2nd paragraph: s/Caluculate/Calculate4th paragraph: 
>Arguably this should be from bottom-to-top as, going from 
>top-to-bottom, once you have concatenated two lines the '\' will not be 
>on the folding-column
>             [Qin]:In our code, we will delete unneeded ‘\’ line by line 
>from top to bottom. It think whether from bottom to top or from top to 
>bottom, it doesn’t matter since it is implementation specific.

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.